smeg@feddit.uk to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 11 个月前Old xkcd, I can't see it ever not being relevantxkcd.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1285arrow-down17
arrow-up1278arrow-down1external-linkOld xkcd, I can't see it ever not being relevantxkcd.comsmeg@feddit.uk to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 11 个月前message-square40fedilink
minus-squarejeremyparker@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·11 个月前 it’s weird that it happened twice Everyone who dabbles in programming eventually learns :q. Not everyone learns :wq.
minus-squarejeremyparker@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 个月前Wtf is this bullshit. When tf did vim start allowing you to do the same thing in more than one way
minus-squarejeremyparker@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 个月前Vim wasn’t invented, it spawned fully written and tested at the moment creation came into existence That’s why vi is already installed on every Linux system
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 个月前of course! no but i bet configurability was an early fearure
Everyone who dabbles in programming eventually learns
:q. Not everyone learns:wq.I learned
:q!first!Not everyone learns :x
Or
ZZWtf is this bullshit. When tf did vim start allowing you to do the same thing in more than one way
hmm, when was vim invented?..
Vim wasn’t invented, it spawned fully written and tested at the moment creation came into existence
That’s why vi is already installed on every Linux system
of course!
no but i bet configurability was an early fearure
Oh I don’t know that one, what’s it do?
Same as
:wqand:xSaves and quits.