• Lemmist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Isn’t it just a genre-related situation? Blacks don’t make much rock/metal/whatever. And rap/hip-hop have a limited amount of fans.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      “blacks”

      I’m judging you now. It’s been decades since this has been ok to say. C’mon, catch up.

      “Don’t make much rock”

      I think you mean to say they literally invented rock.

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      My dude. Please learn a little bit about the history of music. It’s ok to be ignorant of it. You grew up in a country that has appropriated and stolen the art forms of black artist since before jazz music even existed.

      But some of us use this massive source of information called “The Internet” to actually learn. Seriously, there is so much interesting shit out there. You don’t even need to be “woke”. You can literally just be interested in where music genres came from and their influence. If you do even a little bit of listening you’ll learn about how heavily every form of “pop” culture is heavily heavily influenced by black culture and in turn monetized by capitalist for profit.

      Today the “face” of which is exploited black artist. But in the past was often a “white face” that was used to monetize black culture or artist that could never become “mainstream”.

      This is exactly what a dude from the 80s knew. And he didn’t even have the Internet. He just knew the music industry and called it out for its failures. You have no excuse in 2025 to judge a white dude in the 80s pointing to well documented exploitations of black culture.

      Black Americans did not only influence rap. They influenced every part of pop music for a century. They were only able to be successfully monetized around the time that rap music became popular. Seriously, you can open yourself up to a whole new world of music and history. You just have to be curious. You have the Internet. Good luck mate.

      • Lemmist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You don’t know where I grew up.

        History means nothing here. Influence means nothing here. “appropriated and stolen the art forms” – this doesn’t even make sense.

        There is a channel that plays a set of genres in some proportions.
        There are bands that play different genres in some proportions.
        Channel select bands according to its set of preferred genres.

        Now do a “Venn diagram” or whatever might help you to think.

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t need to know where you grew up. Youre alive right now. So you grew up in a world that was heavily influenced by black artists that you’ve never even heard the name of. I was trying to give you an “out” for your absolute stupidity and ignorance. But you just decided to doubled down. You clearly have a child’s understanding of history. I can’t help you with that. You have to seek it out on your own. Otherwise you can keep sounding like the really ignorant but confident uncle at the Thanksgiving table.

        • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          …. You know that modern rock music as we know it was directly copying the work of black artists like Little Richard, right?

          Maybe “bands play different genres in some proportions” (that you know of) due to the disproportionate marketing and airplay they received at the time Bowie was speaking about this issue.

          Channels selected bands based on what they thought they could sell. And they weren’t interested in platforming black artists. Maybe they weren’t selling black music because the white music execs didn’t want to give it a chance (racism). This is exactly what people talk about when they say racism is a systemic issue.

          There’s also a little bit of history to know that when Bowie was talking about this MTV was the biggest thing that could skyrocket an artist or a band to popularity. Multiple “channels” didn’t exist.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No, no, no. This is all about race and not music genres. That’s why MTV is always playing Dean Martin instead of Louis Armstrong. /s

          If white people want see more black people on MTV then they need to start liking the genres black people are currently doing. But why anyone would listen to music for a skin colour is fucking weird anyway.