I use borgbackup, with daily backup to borgbase.

At some point I want to set up a distributed file system between multiple locations as both a backup target and also a network share with automatic snapshots or some other undelete mechanism, but I still need to get the hardware for that and the current setup works well

True. I knew I should have left that as “NFS 4” because someone would comment this. From what I’ve read (never used it), NFS 3 is very different to 4 and also just kind of not worth using, especially just for Windows, since it has no security at all.

Please just use Kerberos instead of fiddling with uids. It’s the only sane way to get NFS access controls and user mapping. Works on both Linux and macOS (but there’s no NFS on Windows anyway).

I’d say you can run the Kerberos KDC on the NAS but if Synology has some locked down special OS you’ll need another machine for that (edit: but you say you have other servers already so that shouldn’t be a problem).

Unfortunately SMB is so screwed that you can’t reuse ordinary Kerberos for authentication there, which is unfortunate if you want to have both that and NFS. I’ve yet to look into whether Samba AD can be used for both.

As someone has already written in another comment, the Apple Music app.

You have to do more than say “wrong, no u” at a Wikipedia article with sources.

What else are they supposed to say so they don’t get zero content responses like yours? Are you the China expert which can disprove what they’re saying?

I’m certainly not so I have no idea what the actual reality here is, it’s essentially someone’s word against someone else’s.

This seems super overcomplicated. What I would do is put all the subdomains on the public DNS, let HTTP(S) through the firewall for the respective hosts, deny everything from outside of your local network on the http server that isn’t under the HTTP challenge path and then run the HTTP challenge as you would for a public site.

Then you can get certs, everyone outside trying to access will get 403, and inside the network you can access as normal.

Of course you’ll have to trust your http server’s ACL for that, but I’m just going to assume servers like nginx (which I use) have a reliable implementation.

Are you talking about these? They don’t look like they have a PCIe slot…

In any case, the specifications say

Form factor Low-profile 119.65 x 68.9 x 17.24 mm (Without bracket 119.65 x 68.9 x 12 mm)

pick lock on door

It would need a PCIe slot, not a SATA connection. But I assume it doesn’t have that either then.

I have the QNAP TL-D800S. It’s an 8 bay DAS but there is also a 4 bay variant. Works well for me. It uses SFF cables to connect to the PC and comes with the appropriate PCIe card which seems more robust to me than anything USB for this.

The classic libre task tracker is Bugzilla. It’s definitely geared towards software development and large projects with multiple people though, and you won’t find anything like a kanban view, so it may or may not be suitable for you.

Huh. https://web.archive.org/web/20241212125937/https://drewdevault.com/2024/12/10/2024-12-10-Daily-driving-jujutsu.html

Any registrar worth using has an API for updating DNS entries.

I just found this with a quick search: https://github.com/qdm12/ddns-updater

Yeah, when I got started I initially put everything in Docker because that’s what I was recommended to do, but after a couple years I moved everything out again because of the increased complexity, especially in terms of the networking, and that you now have to deal with the way Docker does things, and I’m not getting anything out of it that would make up for that.

When I moved it out back then I was running Gentoo on my servers, by now it’s NixOS because of the declarative service configuration, which shines especially in a server environment. If you want easy service setup, like people usually say they like about Docker, I think it’s definitely worth a try. It can be as simple as “services.foo.enable = true”.

(To be fair NixOS has complexity too, but most of it is in learning how the configuration language which builds your operating system works, and not in the actual system itself, which is mostly standard except for the store. A NixOS service module generates a normal systemd service + potentially other files in the file system.)

I wasn’t able to edit a hunk (like the e key in git add -p) which I use a lot to split debug statements from real work

I don’t think the builtin diff editor can do this, but you can set a different diff editor than the builtin one: https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/blob/main/docs/config.md#editing-diffs

edit: but wait, debug statements? Are they mixed in on the same line as the real code? The builtin diff editor can pick changes per line.

I found no way to show the original diff

jj evolog to show how a single change evolved including the previous commit that didn’t have the conflict yet, if that’s what you mean.

jj undo did not worked (I have not been able to undo the jj squash that introduced the conflict

If you did something afterwards, the operation you undo will no longer be the squash. Look at jj op log to see which one is the correct one to undo.

okay ❤️ yay ❤️

deleted by creator

NFS

The ones used for English? Sure. When it comes to other languages I certainly don’t know all of them though.

Though, that is at least partially due to me learning English as a second language so I’ve looked at these a lot in dictionaries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/English

This is phonetic¹ spelling. The only good one.

¹ Actually phonemic. Don’t kill me