I’ve actually wondered if it’s possible to make a decent living taking a larger upfront cost to personally meet with people locally then match them accordingly. I just worry that it would be a lot of explaining to men that they don’t shower enough and to women that they’re either going to have to stay single, date other women, only have casual sex, or just accept that the bar is on the damn floor and I’m just trying to find them a man that showers and vaguely shares their cultural family values.
Edit: after thinking about it, I think it might have actually solved the problem of how to make a federated dating service. Instead of creating a platform to automatically match individual profiles, you create a platform aimed primarily at matchmakers, but with a feature where they can send clients a form to fill out, and then give them an easy to browse and maintain client database. It would be a platform where individual matchmakers could self-host, but similar to other spaces in fedi a lot of people would probably feel more comfortable using matchmakers hosted on larger instances. The matchmakers would advertise their own profiles locally, and if you wanted to make it really easy you could have a poster generator with the platform’s logo and their name and a qr code. Instances might start free to get themselves off the ground but eventually charge the matchmakers a small fee to maintain the server (and if they don’t like how much they’re being charged they could move instances; you could make them be able to export their database as a .csv or something that they could keep backed up and the smart ones would avoid instances that don’t offer that option).
So you could look up matchmakers in your area and see details about them like the size of their existing client base, the amount of successful matches they’ve made, and their typical approaches like whether they provide coaching and whether they’re specialized in a specific religious or cultural community. And if they’re allowed to list their own prices and you could sort by cost per size of their client base or price per number of successful matches which would create a cost gradient where you can go cheaper but for less experience.
Then on the client profile they’d all be mostly only visible to the individual client and the matchmaker but they could send the profiles to the people they’re trying to match and if they have hard to match clients they could choose to share them with other local matchmakers. And they’d be able to sort their database based on percentages of profiles that match similar to how OKC used to have. You could also have them personalize questionnaires like maybe have boilerplate / template questionnaires of various lengths to get new matchmakers started but also help them be more transferable for those hard to make matches. But you’d also still have basic info for everybody like gender, age, what genders they’re looking for, and what type of relationships they’re seeking.
As for how this solves the fedi dating service problem: it solves the issue of having women be too scared to make their dating profiles too public and decentralized servers and individually paid human matchmakers would help prevent enshittification because there’s no one large company that’s profiting off making the service shittier.
Somebody feel free to use my idea, I’ll be your first matchmaker, LOL:
And honestly to me a pretty necessary one. I see the utility of a service like okc used to be where you take all those quizzes then get a match percentage based on that because that would get a lot of the more boring work out of the way, but imo you would also need someone to personally evaluate how the people interact with a person they’re not intending to have sex with, because that’s going to be the biggest indicator of their true character and what factors are actually going to make people compatible beyond those first few interactions. You’d be able to match people who might not consider each other otherwise, and help people skip people who might look nice but don’t actually have anything in common. You could also give people some more honest feedback on what they’re doing that’s not matching up with the result they’re trying to achieve.