• 0 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle












  • Bruh, it sounds like she was coerced and lead. She likely believed she that she had selected the correct person.

    Plus, how is this not on the courts and jurors? They had actual evidence matching someone else that would have exonerated him, they purposefully ensured that he was judged by an all white jury, and they coerced/lead the victim.

    Come on now guys, we all fucking know that police play head games with people to get BS confessions. This isn’t hard. They wanted a conviction, and they did whatever they could to get one, no matter whether it was the correct perpetrator or not.


  • Bruh. Quoted from the article:

    "They said that the prosecution’s main piece of evidence was the victim’s identification of Long weeks after the attack and that it was “the product of a suggestive identification procedure arranged by the police to target Long.”

    There were also numerous pieces of evidence from the scene, including suspect hair and 43 fingerprints, that could have helped exonerate him, according to his attorneys. The material, which they said did not belong to Long, was tested by investigators but not disclosed. The attorneys also accused Concord police officers of giving false testimony about the evidence at Long’s trial."

    It sounds like she was led by the police, and all evidence pointing to the contrary was tossed out.