I can see that. I didn’t mention the lack of evidence problem because the author did that in spades. I guess that’s what I get for just firing off a comment!

Updated

Not sure why I’m being down voted so much, lol.

Wish people would engage if they disagree instead of just doing a drive by

I’m friendly, I promise!

Very interesting article

The issue feels a lot like climate change. Pollution that affects us on a global scale that will make some people immensely rich and it’s up to the cooperation of countries to research, mitigate, and control it

Op is saying it’s a problem of supply not meeting demand

You’re saying that supply can’t meet demand if the rich have infinite demand

These aren’t exactly incompatible. I haven’t seen good evidence that demand from the wealthy explains the massive increase in housing cost, but you can both build more housing to increase supply and try to limit the wealthy buying too much housing. They’re not incompatible

From my understanding the use is totally safe

I’m told you could eat big chunks of the stuff and it would pass right through you.

PFAS is so carcinogenic that if you WERE getting some of it in your body from this kind of exposure then we’d see really high cancer rates, the same way we do in factories near it. At least, that’s my conjecture

Minutes food did a good video on it’s safety if you’re interested

https://youtu.be/R1hbV3EzOD4?si=zoXdismsEJvZW_9G

Note that it seems to be pretty safe when it’s applied to something. The danger is mostly when it’s applied/created. The big reason to not buy these products and to look for alternatives is that you’re decreasing demand for the products

Growing up in Florida I thought I was good at telling the Cardinal directions because it was easy to align with the roads

Now that I live in Boston I can’t navigate anywhere