IMO, Money equates to power and authority. They aren’t wrong in thinking that, but have you ever heard the saying “absolute power corrupts absolutely” or “Evil checked grows. Evil tolerated poisons the whole system”?

Spray tan

https://lemm.ee/c/DataBackRibs I’m trying to make a community where people can be open with data and findings, have a respectful discussion, and then both parties “Walk away” with better knowledge while not getting that social media ego. I hope that makes sense

Well, if that’s the case, then I have a community called “DataBackRibs” that would definitely appreciate you specific data about ducks and mallards

That’s a good one. I’m gonna try that

Exactly what I’m looking for. Thank You!

What do you mean?

Experience of credibility with a source. If you know a news site is credible, then it’s appropriate to trust at least most things.

If it’s a journal or a blog, then it’s most likely opinion with no real substantial evidence.

Experience of the writer of the source. A lot of official articles will have a small bio about the writer or at least their name so you can research the writer.

Citations. That’s all on that point

Site security. If it’s an unsecured site, then it is not a good source of information

Verbiage. If bias or insulting language is being used, then it’s a bias source which makes it a bad source.

Nope. We are everywhere. We’re in your home, your car, your job, your economy. We are many for We are Legion

The popular vote be damned

Within the next 4-10 years, I’m probably going to die for this fucking country on the home front, but fuck it

I don’t run and would still never advise wool

Lol. Get out of their way or what?

Trump’s 1st term was pretty much Reagan 2.0. If he’s going to stay with that theme, this term will be Bush (Sr.) 2.0

Nixon actually had the highest GDP growth with 3.5%. Second was Reagan at 3.48%

Superiority complexes, hero complexes, tribalism, religion, influencers, up-bringing, predisposition…

Yes. It’s a very wrong perspective.

So let me break it down, and I’m not trying to be alienating or picking a side in the arguments of sex, gender, or color.

In the US, at least, it’s very close enough to say that it’s a half split on biologically born male and female.

Around 25% of those people identify to associate with the LGBTQIA+ group.

Around 32% of Americans are black

19% are Hispanic

7% are asian

And I’m adding this for effect: 58% are european

Now! If we look at the multiple demographic and ethnic ideas and peoples, then we see a different perspective, idea, and solutions.

I didn’t even mention religious or political ideologies, which would make the breakdown even deeper.

My point is that “who we fight for” is not a thing that we can identify with our eyes anymore. We should fight for affection and life. The hardest part is seeing people oppose what looks like who we/what concern ourselves with. That should tell you that not everyone who looks like the person who opposes you might not be your enemy. We have seen what happens when fear and hate control our emotions. Yet very few people want to do anything about it

I’m not saying that at all. What I’m saying is wait until the inauguration at least

No

Wait. Life as we know it isn’t over yet. Let the man actually get into office and see if he’ll actually work for the majority this time around. But the second when he again charges the taxpayers to pay for his visits to Mar-a-lago again, then be pissed