You say it could be illegal and then quote a law that talks about sometime else. I have no idea why you would do that.
Oh sorry I misread legal as illegal. My bad.
You say it could be illegal and then quote a law that talks about sometime else. I have no idea why you would do that.
Oh sorry I misread legal as illegal. My bad.
A projection is not permanent mate.
“Hi trans”? Not many options why you would say something this stupid.
Nice whataboutism. You are free to call out others where you see issues, that does not somehow make this any less worse or less noteworthy. No idea why you think that just because there is other shit means that we need to ignore this?
This is pure gold.
You can buy a different car with the money you get from selling it, no? And I assume that will not exactly be a bad car either.
Why do you think so? It is a static magnetic field that is only “visible” to the sensor during storage?
No, quickly as in years. There is no more coal or oil formed today, there are now organisms that can digest every part of organic stuff. There were none back then for example for lignin from wood, which is where we got coal from.
Correct, but not only is it extremely little, this stored energy is also quickly released again after the organism dies.
Just note that the released energy of burning fossils (or nuclear) is orders of magnitude below what the sun does. It really is only the CO2 from coal (or CO2 and CH4 from natural gas, …) that does the heating, since it acts like insulation.
Why would you put it in "? Do you think those are not going to be really and/or multiple?
We are talking about a monthly average upload of something like 100 Mbit/s, which of worth about constantly streaming 2 movies at 50 G. The peaks during prime time are multiples of that, realistically exceeding 1 GB/s, since most people stream evening/night. Then he would need to be streaming tons of movies, making him a prime target for a big lawsuit. Instead, if he just downloads and seeds some files, you get a near constant throughput. Linux, Tor node, or some mixture of all of that. But not a streaming service for a dozens of people.
Downloading tons of content. Seems more likely than being a central streaming hub for tons of people for multiple reasons.
How did people like that? Crazy.
So how much traffic do you generate?
40 TiB per month are 1.3 TiB daily. Even at 10 GiB per movie that’s 100 movies every single day. I doubt that is the reason.
So many people here talk about the thickness needed of else it heats up. That is simply wrong. The heat is the same per length and is dissipated the same way with twice the length aka the temperature is the same*. The issue is that the short circuit current could drop below the value needed to actually pop the breaker, allowing for a ton of heat to be generated where it shouldn’t be. The same way a light bulb glows bright hot but does not trip the breaker etc., now just imagine the cable to be the glowing part.
*There is another issue if you do not lay them out, that the heat has nowhere to go. Causing coiled wires to have a far lower rating compared to when they are fully extended.
When the breaker trips then the fundamental issue is unlikely to be present. But to be able to push enough current to cause it to break the connection needs to have a sufficiently low resistance. If that gets too high it will never break, even if you short the cables. And that will result in a fire, because the protection does not work anymore. That is the dangerous part.
Probably because of the (originally) decentralized nature. But it is everything but decentralized, pretty much like water infrastructure or streets. So many single points is failure. Sure you could drive 1000 miles through 100 towns, and with only few doing that it will “only” take a lot longer. But route a mayor portion of the traffic through there and that will be the end of that.
How to prove something is a Nazi salute if the way it is done is not said proof in itself?