“We’ve spent two years requiring our apps from the ground up to boost our development speed, which should enable us to bring new features to you more efficiently, across more platforms,”
… “and that’s why we’re deleting a bunch of features never to bring them back. Because we’re just so efficient!” Crazy how many companies use this awful excuse.
Also is that a misquote by the author or did they really write “requiring”?
How do we know anything? Because we can prove it. We can confirm it through repeatable tests or there is insurmountable evidence for it to be true. I don’t see how there’s any proof of us being in a simulation, thus I live my life as if we aren’t. Although I could just be an NPC trying to convince you otherwise…
Not the hero we needed, but the one I wanted.
You make a good point lol. I’ve made the classic blunder of not reading the sub name…
And for those wanting a simpler and more traditional application, Nicotine+ is a great introduction.
“Would have” or “would’ve”, never “would of”. Unless you have a would of gotten, in which case carry on.
That makes sense, it’s probably the same people writing both messages.
Check r/conservative and you get a fair idea.
Don’t make the same mistake I did. Get a backup in place before using ZFS. Using ZFS and RAIDing your drives together makes them a singular failure point. If ZFS fucks up, you’re done. The only way to mitigate this is having another copy in a different pool and preferably different machine. I got lucky that my corrupted ZFS pool was still readable and I could copy files off, but others have not been so lucky.
To expand on what Grappling said, I’ll give you an example. A few years ago the city repaved a decrepit section of road into a smooth and wide open road that is wide enough for 4 lanes but made into 2 wide ones with massive shoulders. There are no pedestrians on this road and you can comfortably go 80-100km/h. The speed limit they set? 50. While it’s not every road, it is definitely a lot of roads that get treated like this. It results in getting very comfortable with breaking the speed limits because the speed limits are stupid not matched to the designs of the roads.
… oh. It begins then. Thank you for the multiple links!
Uh, I missed this one. Someone got the backstory?
Been sleeping the majority of the last 36 hours in between emptying my stomach, so not too hot. I really should not go into work today but I probably will anyway.
Removing news from your regular feeds or taking a break from them for a week is chill, everyone should do that here and there. But don’t bury your head in the sand, you should keep an eye on it even if that is only browsing a dedicated news feed every week or two. Ignorance and complacency is how we got Trump 2024 with people actively voting against themselves.
*For a limited set of languages. Until they add Japanese I won’t be getting much use from it, sadly.
I understood the reference post as I’m far too deep into degenerate internet culture, but I have definitely experienced what you say. I think sometimes people write in a way that simply doesn’t welcome people not on their wavelength. And that’s okay!.. as long as they don’t expect broad understanding.
Does “all” remove every type of segment? Because that seems excessive for most people, there is a lot of filler/etc sections that are over-zealously tagged.
Climate change is rather important too but I wouldn’t bring it up when asked about my opinion on ice cream.
I’m using Gluetun via Docker Compose as well right now and can happily say all the ports exposed via the
ports:setting are local network only. I could port forward them via the router probably (haven’t tried) but I only use them for access via LAN. To expose ports over the VPN connection you use theFIREWALL_VPN_INPUT_PORTSenvironment variable. A stripped version of my current compose (example port numbers, not real) with LAN access to6000and WAN access to1234and5678:services: gluetun: image: qmcgaw/gluetun:latest restart: unless-stopped container_name: gluetun cap_add: - NET_ADMIN # in the default compose file i dunno what this does tbh environment: - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom - VPN_TYPE=openvpn - OPENVPN_VERSION=<redacted> - OPENVPN_USER=<redacted> - OPENVPN_PASSWORD=<redacted> - OPENVPN_CUSTOM_CONFIG=/gluetun/custom.ovpn - FIREWALL_VPN_INPUT_PORTS=1234,5678 # allows ports through VPN connection - FIREWALL_OUTBOUND_SUBNETS=192.168.0.0/24 # I found that I needed this for certain LAN access ports: - 6000:6000 # port i access via LAN volumes: - /mnt/example/config.ovpn:/gluetun/custom.ovpn