That’s Mount Tahoma, in California
I’m your huckleberry
Much appreciated. The mods here at !news@lemmy.world prefer civil discourse. If we see someone not displaying civility (attacking the person, not the argument), trolling, being racist, sexist, or being a bigot, we will remove a comment.
We try not to let our views skew our moderation, and will reverse removals if we feel we or other mods were acting heavy-handed.
With that said, we appreciate admins of other members of the Lemmy federation stepping in to police users of their instance.
With that said, yes, we have received other complaints about this user, but did not find all the complaints warranted. Some were, and we handled those comments as they were brought to our attention.
We may not agree with all the comments here, but if they follow our rules, they stay.
Both of you need to stop this childish bickering. If you cannot, you will receive a vacation from !news
Leaving comments up because the thread is so long, removing them all would take too long, and none are bad enough to warrant it.
Both of you need to stop this childish bickering. If you cannot, you will receive a vacation from !news
Leaving comments up because the thread is so long, removing them all would take too long, and none are bad enough to warrant it.
Comments in this post are going off the rails. If we receive any more reports on comments here, we will be locking this post.
When - 3 times through my adulthood, and most of my childhood prior to foster care
Where - Missouri, Arkansas, New Mexico, and Arizona
Leaving this up, as it is news. Italian News.
I removed their comment for rule 1 violation, but they aren’t wrong. I used to be homeless (we prefer the term “travelers”). We called ourselves homeless when not using the term traveler, and weren’t fond of the term “unhomed”.
Could you tell me the post you’re referencing? I would like to investigate this further for you.
I wasn’t arguing with you about what they say NOW. I was pointing you to what they literally said THEN.
You said “a well regulated militia didn’t mean the same thing back then”
I merely pointed you to the founders own words to show you that you were wrong.
It wasn’t an amendment. It was baked into the first article.
You pointing out the RECENT supreme court ruling was a bad faith argument against my rebuttal.
Your comment has been reported, but as you had links and appeared to be arguing in good-faith, I decided to leave it. With that said, I completely disagree with your words.
Review Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 15-16.
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Militia was what we now call “National Guard”. Speaking from experience, as a former guardsman as well as vet in 2 other branches. Back when I went to basic, this was well discussed as a given. I’m surprised people think otherwise to this day.
deleted by creator
God, I wish I was smart enough to lie this well. No. I like sex, and hate condoms. I’m the dum.
You incorrectly assume I’m intelligent.
I make ~$200K a year. As a father of 5, I wish I had not had a single one. I love them, but the stress of taking care of them coupled with the future of the planet makes me regret life choices.
Rather than arguing, I have requested that other moderators intervene, so there no semblance of me being heavy-handed in my actions regarding this. I have explained the rules, and the justifications of actions taken.
From the modlog (trolling emphasized):
I also guarantee that the cops and guards were treating him like shit Oh you guarantee it huh? Must be fact then. Thanks for personally guaranteeing this one for us. We wouldn’t want to trifle with such things as evidence when selecting our pitchforks now would we? Thanks for the downvotes =)
Yeah… Not really.
Let’s think this through. If the president has immunity, then any order he gives falls under the same immunity.
If I tell you to steal, and anything I say is legal, you stealing would fall under that umbrella. What I tell you to do can’t be legal if you doing it is illegal.