That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.

As he is not a US citizen he was not able to use the X amendment to free speech.

As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-01/julian-assange-supporters-write-to-pm-over-reported-cia-plot/100504522

He didn’t leak, he published.

That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.

If precedent was set they could kidnap anyone from sovereign countries based on US law

This comment seems contentious. Are the differences in opinion political? An ideological opposition?

• Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC)
• China, the Peoples Republic of China (PRC)

.

Thank you for your comment, it provided more context than the article

To improve the quality of each frame as you upscale it

Isn’t this a perfect example where stable diffusion excels over the traditional process?

It’s an interesting one to me for two reasons.

\1. Israels allies are culturally and ideologically opposed to what Israel has been doing in the region since WW2. It is imperialistic, subjugating and what the west has been trying to move away from in the later half of the 20th century. However, it is strategic to them to support Israel so they will continue to bite their tongues and support their ally.

\2. After the second world war Europe has been very cautious of any nation displaying imperialist intent. The mindset was featured heavily in the Falkland island conflict, etc. With Israel’s obvious intent of expanding their land, especially with Zionist ambition, many strategists in Europe may find themselves thinking of the similarities between 1940s Germany and the current political ideology of the state of Israel.

This also ignores the growing middle class in China and India. Countries will have to be quality of life competitive or they will experience brain drain to the west.

Agreed, my bad

The 1967 amendment already did that. But yes, the campaigns were about the voice, not recognition of first nations people

The title is hugely misrepresenting the referendum.

Not even our conservative party, the liberals, opposed recognition of aboriginal and Torres islander people as the traditional owners of the land.

The neo liberal progressive party, labor, put in a change to political process. This is what people disagreed with.

Awh, she thinks you’re warm and cosy

As this doesn’t interfere with mining interests or criticism of the government the AFP will be sleeping through any antisemitic sentiment

Gotta love media wording.

Both a prisoners of war, many are civilians on both sides. But one group have prisoners and the other have hostages.

For so many reasons, this is the best generation to be an autistic child.

I wonder how many times Shrek was watched by millennials. Thinking back, the move to DVDs was a godsend; the decay of VCRs at the top of the videos would have been a consistency issue.

They should investigate, sure. However, the true test is in the court’s. A ruling supporting that Momika’s demonstration is in protest and does not preditorally target a religious group would be of benefit to future activists.

What is with the down votes? What are you disagreeing with?

I don’t trust the source, but why downvote without comment?

Land use is the main contributor. The OP article is knot great. Seaweed only helps with methane. Still, good.

Yeah, the main focus of greenhouse gasses in the literature is from land use. The amount of land used for rumanents and their feedstock could plant forests the world over. And don’t get me started, noone is farming on the sides of mountains

Big shock, it’s vegetables