

But this also blocks supplies for the hostages doesn’t it?
But this also blocks supplies for the hostages doesn’t it?
I think you’re technically correct in this instance.
After 2 weeks she had slowed to a crawl
Seems like a good start generally. Not sure about insurance though is it health or liability? Never had health insurance for pets, always preferred to save it and then pay outright for care without any of the usual wrangling about getting them to pay up.
Haven’t we seen enough sci-fi movies to know that having creepy humanoid robots hanging around is a bad idea. They should all look like Bender from Futurama or Marvin the paranoid Android
When you have a team lead, technical lead, QA lead, FE lead, BE lead, Engineering Manager and head of engineering, I think most SMs give up trying to get the team to self manage, seems like no one else is interested in that!
It’s easy to be cynical and 150M towards health benefits seems like a good and altruistic offer but shouldn’t the studio be paying health benefits. Is this just a golden strike buster so top Hollywood actors can get back to earning millions while the rest return to crappy conditions.
Is it really a war or just war crimes?
Markets need to be regulated in order to function properly
If UK is going to go it’s own way, I don’t see why they don’t just keep the reactor going. Not that going it’s own way seems very sensible anyway.
I think that is giving them a free pass. No country is perfect but Israel is now ramping up a campaign of genocide which puts them among the worst
“The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) sets the minimum base wage at $2.13 per hour,…”
tells me all I need to know about this story
This is how they behave when the eyes of the world are watching…
Spams decades
Nah I think they just got a judge who gives a shit about humanity…
The Section of the Public Order Act 1986 lays out rules for how police can control “public assemblies” – defined as a gathering of two or more people in a public place.
Police officers can issue them if they “reasonably believe” that the protest “may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community”.
It can also do so if it belives the purpose of the organisers is to “intimidate others”.
What surprised me was this is the older legislation. I thought they would use the newer anti protest legislation which even legislates against a protest being too noisy.