Why is it framed like it’s something extreme?
Why is it framed like it’s something extreme?
I wish it was true here. Major releases are always the most shameful ones because so much is always left to “we can fix that later”
The world won’t be any better if you don’t. The only difference is what you’d feel about it yourself.
I still meet new people to play with whenever I start a new mmo. I started one just last week, asked for a guild on the recruit chat, joined their discord and played together for a while.
I guess it really just depends on what kind of game you’re playing and how old the game is. For games that have been going on for years, I doubt any guild would want to recruit people out of the public chat right away.
Niantic always announced itself as a data company.
Something in the way of “an apartment key is useless if you can’t get into the building”.
Rule of thumb:
I’m half asleep so I may have forgotten something but if I didn’t, then answering No to all of those should be the minimum thing you do.
Ok that may take a few years.
With Climate Change we’ll eventually run out of names. Unless Hurricane Karen manages to be the one that kills everyone before that happens.
Not necessarily. They might just be able to choose the strength at will and decided not to start out with the max output back with Katrina.
Oh I trust my code, but I don’t trust my coworkers not to break something on the very next commit.
ClickUp is A LOT worse than Jira.
If a tool were created that properly converted an UML diagram into a project without any need for code, all the programmers that lost their job to this tool would then be hired by the company that offered it, in order to give maintenance and support to everything the customers want in their programs.
It would be removing programmers from they payroll of some companies but they would still be working for them, just further down in the chain.
The same is true for AI. If AI could completely replace programmers in some area, it would need a lot of programmers itself to keep dealing with all the edge cases that would show up from being used everywhere that a programmer was needed before.
I believed they maybe weren’t listening because those cases that people claim as “proof” of listening can usually be explained in other ways as well. People tend to assume they were listening because its the easier explanation but with the amount of data that Meta has, they can easily lead people into thinking about things by showing specific posts on the Facebook timeline and also predict to some extent what people may end up talking about based on things like how many times you replay a certain video and how long did you keep certain posts in focus on the screen and that sort of stuff that people often don’t realize is also data for them.
Still, I would never put my hand on fire for them and never completely discarded the possibility of them listening.
Well we always accused Meta of listening. If it was their partners, they technically weren’t lying when they said they weren’t. “we don’t need to listen to you” was technically correct too, it just missed one word: “we don’t need to listen to you ourselves”
Just last month I was thinking about asking somewhere if there was any chance we could ever find more than the usual stuff or if there would be no way for a perfect preservation to happen naturally. Guess I have my answer now.
My favorite 8 bit game was The Little Samson. So few people know about it but it was an incredible game for that time.
There are many communities I would have no interest in participating actively, but that I still like to hear about when something big happens. The all feed kinda gives me that sort of experience.
GitLab has such a strong work from home culture that I wish more companies would adopt, I hope they don’t lose that if they’re sold.
The problem lies in wanting women to look better in the first place.