ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]

  • 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 21st, 2023

help-circle




  • I will pedant your debatefetishist asshole in half, fuck face:

    Let’s get up a definition of oligarchy, shall we? You’re gonna run to Wikipedia or dictionary.com so I’ll just go for Wikipedia:

    Oligarchy (from Ancient Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía) ‘rule by few’; from ὀλίγος (olígos) ‘few’ and ἄρχω (árkhō) ‘to rule, command’)[1][2][3] is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people. These people may or may not be distinguished by one or several characteristics, such as nobility, fame, wealth, education, or corporate, religious, political, or military control.

    Now, in the UK, there’s a population of around 70 million people, with 650 elected members of government and 805 unelected members, making up a rounding error of the total population.

    In America, over 300 million people are represented by 535 members of its senate, plus a handful of unelected judges and executive legislators. Again, they make up a rounding error of the population.

    France - 66 million, 925. Germany - 85 million, 733. Norway - 5 and a half million, 169. By all means, include the family members and hangers-on who aren’t actively in power but still weild it, and you could quadruple or quintuple those numbers. Doesn’t really matter, still comes out to a rounding error.

    Maybe instead of jacking yourself off over liberalism you should take a moment to actually step back and look at the situation a little more objectively. Being able to vote for which people the power rests with does not increase the number of people welding it.
















  • Dutch didn’t, not alone, far from that.

    As opposed to the chinese, who are completely alone, all 1.whatever billion of them.

    which are[…]largely self-reliant in the matter

    You just fucking said it required cooperation you dumb cum juggler, now you’re saying they failed despite not cooperating?

    I didn’t write that they “wouldn’t be able to”

    I cannot sufficiently describe how much I hate your stupid reddit tier “um, akshumally I didn’t use those exact words therefore you’re completely misrepresenting what I said!” You won’t shut up about how hard and difficult and borderline impossible it is and you want me to believe you’re not trying to say they won’t be able to? You’re certainly not arguing that they will.

    if China wants to meet the ever growing domestic demand (either military or civil), China need fabs churning chips reliably.

    That’s not what commercially viable mean, buddy.