I’d assume people that are bi are attracted to biological males and biological females, but not necessarily transsexuals or anything else on the sexuality/gender spectrum.

FSD isn’t the only feature locked behind a paywall.

They lock up everything from heated seats to acceleration speed.

It’s not my analogy, but it does make sense if you even remotely think about it. The downside is that my car carries extra weight in the form of this additional hardware. Teslas are heavy enough as-is with their giant batteries, I’d rather remove any and all unnecessary weight for the sake of my tire tread life (and battery life). Also depending on exactly what the hardware is, it can be an additional point of failure that could potentially cause things that I do have access to to break. Lastly, it’s fair to assume that the price of the car would be cheaper if Tesla didn’t have to install this hardware into every car even if it will never be used, so you are likely already paying for this in “hidden” costs that are just rolled into the total price of the car before even paying to enable the features.

Do you know what an analogy is?

Okay thanks for contributing nothing

The guy I replied to said he didn’t want to die from overheating since he doesn’t have AC.

I replied and said that they make affordable and easy to install AC now as a direct and immediate solution to his issue of not wanting to die from overheating due to not having AC.

You come along and say this is a bandaid solution and makes things worse. Okay sure, that’s true for society as a whole on a large enough timeline, but not true for this individual person in the near future.

So I interpreted this as you saying you wouldn’t install AC in his shoes, but also don’t appear to have an alternative course of action in order to not overheat and die due to not having AC, therefore you’d be the first to die.

So you’re saying you’d be the first to die lmao

They make air conditioners that are relatively cheap, pretty easy to install and take up virtually no space these days. Usually wall mounted.

There would be challenges, but again, the scenario we are discussing is a world where we literally can’t grow food in the surrounding land.

You can read all about the concept here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_farming

I mean, in the scenario described where we literally can’t grow food in the surrounding land, it’s hard to say what the political landscape or legal institutions even looks like at that point.

We have the technology for indoor skyscraper style farming.

The fossil fuel industry denied climate change was happening at all for a long time after the term was being used by scientists.

It’s because the “fact” the the fossil fuel industry coined the term climate change is false.

This is the preferred term by scientists, and it has been since before “global warming” became a term.

Politicians and publications that acknowledge the climate crisis should probably start using that term instead of climate change then.

Five guys

You could always tell because no one could ever really explain it in simple terms what it does or why it was useful, other than trying to defend NFTs existing and enjoying the volatility of the crypto market (not currency).