No it’s the complaint about one of the few transparent revenue flows Mozilla managed to pull off.
It’s disabled one step deep on the settings
There is a shitload of stuff going wrong with the Mozilla foundation and this doesn’t even make the top 10.
That’s the reason for my down vote: it’s nothing I want this community to focus on. It’s basically engagement bait with the topic “ads bad”.
Oh yeah I misunderstood you, completely agree!
He did several “come find me from my pic” videos where users sent in images from around the world and he found where it was taken.
I distinctly remember a fishing spot where he basically found the tight tree under which the pic was taken.
If there’s no cherry picking behind the scenes… Then the answer is “yes, it is transferable”.
How is a list of seven(!) different analyzed potential factors reduced by you with a “wtf” to one of those?
And then followed by an anecdote, a correlated studies off topic to the study described and a bit of conspiracy theory (note: one of the few I even support myself, but i’s out of scope of this article!).
You’re actively harming the points you want to make by jumping onto the wrong targets.
No one forces unattended updates. And containerd is already living in the userspace.
If every dev would live on a kernel level stability approach we’d will not have a containerd release at all.
The cheapest framework is nearly five times the OPs link.
While “no laptop” is better than a HP I don’t see this link as helpful as all.
OP, I would check out used markets in this price range. While frameworks are awesome I haven’t seen them being refurbished yet and you regularly have business leasing returns from Lenovo for example that could match your budget.
One thing that was only mentioned briefly by someone else is the physical button turning on the computer.
Similar to the paperclip test figure out where the power button goes into the mainboardw and bridge that with a short cable. Is possible that by moving the case the old button lost a cable.
This is just one more thing to test though, it’s really trial and error as you know :)
Haha my association is “ah damn but I didn’t wanna build a hospital! I’ll just take those people and material and we’ll build a the night awesome cemetery ever!”.
Dunno why my mind went there but I’ll have to thank you for that!
One thing to point out: it doesn’t say “elected”.
In theory it might be just the best leading person for a role.
That in itself is the most complex issue in my opinion: where do leaders come from and how do you make sure that they don’t overstay their need? It’s an unresolved issue and democracy is our best answer yet, in my opinion.
From what I understand: CasaOS is simply an abstraction layer and takes away a lot of the manual work.
I agree with you that this shows down learning quite a bit.
I see three ways forward for you:
a) switch to a Linux base system, Debian, arch, nixos, whatever resonates and set up everything from scratch. High learning curve but no more hidden things.
b) same as a but as a separate setup. This is what I would recommend if you have the time and cash. Replicate what’s already working and compare.
c) figure out how to do things manually within the CasaOS framework. Can’t help you there though :)
Yeah that title is written by someone who’s not understood evolutionary mechanics.
I have no sympathy for this pseudo science bullshit title game.
Lemmy.world is blocked by beehaw as well…
Wow thanks a lot for that!
Haha brainfart. Thought about lan domains…
Who should do this vetting though? The internet was built up with the idea of technical neutrality - everything else came on top. TLDs came later and were used to either describe the origin of a page or its intended(!) use. That leads to the case that not only can a propaganda outlet mark itself as “info” - it’s actually historically correct to do so as it’s about what the host wants to communicate.
ICANN, the organisation behind the TLDs, actually always struggles with this btw. A more recent example was the decision which domain should be reserved for local name services. It took y long time (I think years overall) to get to: .internal (edited, brainfart)
The brackets were implied by OP.
I.e. “one way: (be ignorant || approve)”.
The screenshot had has the criteria included though. Relevant part: either be for children or for everyone.
Have you not read either the abstract (“calorie deficit not helping”) or my comment? (“input on the inefficiency of diets is useless to OP without any impulse on what to do instead”)?
I don’t understand of what you’re aiming for with your oneliners.
The systematic change you describe would make sure that people are “on time” though, just redefining on what that meaning.
Being “on time” I understand as one of two things:
The first one is your responsibility, the latter is impossible to make in a way that works for everyone.
I don’t understand how this “change” should look like, what you’d expect people to do for meeting each other and events.
Of course I’m fine with “I take public transport I’ll be there between four and six” as a statement for punctuality. Beyond that though?
And check for each music service their offered music. I’ve checked out tidal actually today with one of those export playlist tools and about 10% of my (honestly: niche) music wasn’t available.