elaborate reasons why it’s all true
Usually it’s “just read these 10 hundred-year-old books” that they absolutely have not read.
And if you ask them to make a point from those books, they can’t. Apparently they’re only comprehensible as a whole.
Yeah, creating a third party seems a lot easier and more effective than taking over an existing party like the tea party did.
At the time, everything HTTP was supposed to be public.
Don’t forget how they treated Jon Stewart with his show. He wasn’t allowed to criticize China or AI.
There was one who told a plausible story. Spoonamore? But as soon as you try to verify the number claim, it turns out to be bogus.
One of the few things we know about Vance is that he doesn’t believe what he says.
I’d take the coin flip liar over the traitor.
All that does is allow someone in the middle to potentially read your traffic. So what’s secret about the traffic between you and the Internet archive? If it’s only your login details, that seems like a you problem.
It wasn’t long ago that most of the internet was http only.
So you’ve… compromised your own security. Grats?
People do not want to hear, ‘Well, actually the economy is good.’”
In four years these same people are going to line hearing that, regardless of reality.
It’s not about the message. It’s about the color of the team saying it. Red, orange, and white over blue, brown, and white.
Just be grateful if you’re not in one of the first groups. I spoke up as loudly as I could.
I’ll wait 72 hours before settling with it, in case any shenanigans were involved. I expect it’s legitimate, but I want that window open if it’s needed.
I’d click this to humor you, but I’m not going to “rumble dot com”.
wtf are you on?
Fair. I don’t agree with most of your points, but you make a good argument.
I still think we over prioritize decentralization. Federation is important, but’s not a primary feature to be sold to users. It’s not because we need a thousand instances. It’s so that if Gmail gets too enshittified that we have another email option.
World is where the activity is, and you do a reasonable job of balancing that.
Why are you actively against lemmy.world?
On Reddit you list several alternative instances, and you somehow left us out.
I have never seen them used well. I expect there IS some use case out there where it makes sense but I haven’t seen it yet. So many times I’ve seen factories that can only return one type. So why did you use a factory? And a factory that returns more than one type is 50/50 to be scary.
Yeah, I went through the whole shape examples thing in school. The OOP I was taught in school was bullshit.
Make it simpler. Organizing things into classes is absolutely fine. Seven layers of abstraction is typically not fine.
OOP is great, and can be much simpler than what you’ve seen.
It’s Java culture that’s terrible. The word “Factory” is a code smell all on its own.
Just like any tool, don’t overuse it. Don’t force extra layers of abstraction.
Honestly I’ve never thought about it this much. I’ll have to make an effort to stop writing in past tense.
Usually just start with the verb.
“fix a NULL pointer dereference in …”
Yes, but for evidence to the contrary, we elected Trump.