“Misleading Ads, funding experts, lobbying opinions”
This is also just every large industry/corporation ever
“Misleading Ads, funding experts, lobbying opinions”
This is also just every large industry/corporation ever
My favorite part are the upvoters - the ones who didn’t think twice but saw “yeah fuck anti vaxxers!” and put in zero thought
I’ve even gotten up votes since after you deleted the comment. I swear this place is mostly bots
I think the nut job here is the one calling people nut jobs about a vaccine that doesn’t exist
Thank you for providing a rational answer
Asking for ID during an election is the “putting salt/rocks” on the road.
It’s not the equivalent of ripping out the entire road
Is the state checking citizenship when it’s mailing the ballot back to the claimed resident?
How does it do that without ID?
I’ve never been in a car accident, but I still have insurance and put on a seatbelt. Precautions, ya know?
By your election logic, I’ve been good for 20+ years and shouldn’t need either of those
It’s like driving on an icy road - it’s all good until it isnt
I’m asking why you don’t want to protect your system and all you have to offer is “well it’s worked gud for 20+ years!”
You sound like a conservative
Because we’ve all seen how fraudulent people can be right?
This is minor, but take a video game for example - even with nothing to gain, lots of systems have to be put in place because people go out of their way to game the systems and cheat.
Why would something with actual consequences be any different? Why wouldn’t you have even the simplest system in the way of that?
There’s still the open version of fact checking: community notes
What are the facts about this? That it doesn’t happen…that often?
There’s no real time enforcement for it to mean anything. The votes are tallied in real time, and a winner is announced, then months to years later people (who are caught) are prosecuted?
Can someone point out why mail in voting with no ID is a good thing? I’m genuinely curious
This is pretty accurate
Yeah that makes sense, 1nm is just so small that I half assumed we’re nearly at the size of molecules where it would make sense. Turns out a water molecule is only .27nm
Weird how none of this is in parts per million
Fair enough, I see where you’re coming from. Id suggest though, that selfishness and greed are easy to predict - moreso than radicals whose country was backed into a corner of starvation and depression by the rest of the world.
I get the sense you’re a bit biased here lol. If you think any of these politicians at the top give a shit about you, you’re wrong.
Trump is just selfish (like most big politicians). You can’t have no vision and a vision for how to destroy mankind at the same time.
It’s a bit illogical to say you hate insurrectionists and people trying to alter society for their own benefit, and also say “id rather have Hitler as a president”.
Do you see the irony here?
If energy becomes cheap, they lose money. If the stock market doesn’t see their profits rise every quarter, they will trade for less.
These major corps think of societal impact only in the monetary/cash flow sense and lobby heavily to support their position.
We’d need to adjust some rules, and educate more people on nuclear power
I appreciate your awareness of the bias in media groups - sincerely.
I’ll have to give the new legislation a read to see how loose it is before forming hard opinions on it, but I just wanted to highlight where a large cause for concern should be for topics like this.
Energy producers (one of the largest industries) of all kinds input propaganda into the world about their business - and their business is tied to climate research for public perception. Climate is definitely a manipulated message in one form or another