I don’t even disagree that it’s a fine headline, but this community shits its pants everytime an article isn’t extremely accurate in it’s headline, so it’s funny to suddenly have an army of people descent upon this comment section to defend specifically this one.

“Some” would be more useful in this instance, as it would distinguish it from the general case. That’s pretty standard behaviour for news headlines too, right? This study does not concern itself with iron age populations in general but specifically celtic communities between 100 BC and 100 AD in Britain.

I never implied that it would mean “every single man”. That’s a pretty strange way to read my comment.

The word “some” at the beginning of the headline would have been a perfectly acceptable qualification of the phrase which also would’ve better described the actual findings of the study.

Viewing habits have changed, that’s no secret. People go to the theatre more as a social event than just as an avenue to watch a movie. In most places there are ways to go to the theatre relatively cheaply if you make the effort. Don’t get drinks and food, go during the weekday instead of weekends, matinées, some theatres have loyalty programs, smaller movies are also typically cheaper, etc.

If you want the big blockbuster premium experience, then you’ll pay premium prices, but that’s not the only way to see movies in theatres.

They have the money, it’s just not worth dumping endless amounts into marketing if there aren’t enough people interested in watching the movie.

Without Firefox there is no Gecko

There is no Firefox alternative. There is Firefox and there is Chrome. Everything else is just a fancy reskin of either one of them.

• Twilight of the Warriors
• Road House
• Bullet Train
• The Raid

Nobody wants them but everybody watches them

Literally wtf are you talking about? It’s never been easier to look up what movies are playing in theatres right now and how they’ve been received, even if you don’t actively keep up with releases. Straight up bizarre take for a movie forum

They wouldn’t make 4 episodes, they’d make 8 and half of them would be filler episodes.

Okay this is crazy, Alexa play Inside Out by clipping.

This has been well known for years. Just because it’s news to you doesn’t mean it’s a conspiracy.

Where do you get that from?

He didn’t say the MCU is not art.

I’m pretty sure Fincher stopped working on it. It wasn’t Netflix’ decision

The Exorcist. Satanstango. Blue Velvet. 2001 A Space Odyssey

God, I hope so. Inherent Vice is my favourite

Sure, and it’s very disappointing in comparison to the first Aquaman. But for being part of a retired cinematic universe and having comparatively little marketing it still performed alright.

I’m just trying to point out that, because a few, even for superhero movie standards, shit films performed badly and Openheimer performed exceptionally, doesn’t mean that general audiences are tired of being fed recycled material.

Superhero movies are not flopping, dead on arrival capeshit schlock that no one asked for in the first place is flopping. Aquaman made 400 million dollars on a 200 million budget just in December.

The “biopic of a physicist” was made by one of the most recognizable filmmakers in Hollywood and was further propelled forward by a once in a generation hype campaign that will be impossible to repeat, although there’s no doubt in my mind that studios will try nonetheless.