Land of the free, my ass! 🤬

Archived version

Lib Jan 6 is just what’s currently happening: asking the Trump transition team politely to sign the necessary paperwork before granting access to top secret information.

That’s the amount of actual resistance we can ever expect from the “institutions are sacred, people are only important if they donate at least $5000 per election season” Dem leadership.

deleted by creator

make sure you don’t filter out posts about melons

Yeah! Gotta have your melon news! That’s what we’re all here for, am I right??

(I get what you mean and you’re right, your specific example just tickled me 😁)

Rock the girl cock

Weird Al’s take on Rock The Casbah was WAY ahead of its time and also a lot more blue than his usual fare…

Sorry, you’re absolutely right about everything, but I had to 😁

Plus they’re every bit as Zionist as the Times of Israel. You might as well trust the NY ComPost with regards to news involving Israel in any way.

Doubt it, if there are credible claims of systemic access and manipulation of vote totals, people would be all over that shit

Yeah, that’s what they said about all of Trump’s crimes too, but here we are…

That’s not the same as claiming the vote was stolen, and then presenting zero evidence.

I know. What I’m saying is that they’re using the risk of people impervious to evidence as lack of same accusing them as one of many excuses to not admit that the system they hold as more sacred than any ideal is broken and that they did a crappy job defending democracy.

Because the Dem leadership and the billionaire-owned media are too invested in the institutions of democracy to defend democracy itself by pointing out that those institutions broke under pressure from hostile actors that they treated as legitimate.

Also, they’re probably worried that their reasonable inquiries based on actual reality will be equated with the fraudulent “stop the steal” AstroTurf campaign.

Less irony, more that you’re confidently wrong about the unsupported assertions of the pro-zionist NYT.

The irony of using the NYT as an example of media coverage when they STILL refuse to retract the fraudulent “Screams Without Words” article that really galvanized unconditional support for the fascist apartheid regime for the first few months 🤦

A 13 October letter addressed to then-Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer from their US counterparts said Israel must allow 350 aid trucks a day into Gaza over the next 30 days. Most aid organisations estimate that around 700 trucks a day are needed to meet everyday needs.

In the second half of October, the World Food Programme said just 58 trucks a day were being allowed into Gaza

It’s beyond tragicomedy and into dystopia. That anyone believes a word the complicit US government says about the fascist apartheid regime at this point is proof positive that political gaslighting is much more effective than most people believe.

since then, Israeli forces have sealed off northern Gaza and announced on the day of the US election, on 5 November, that its former residents would not return to their homes.

To the surprise of no honest and observant person paying attention. And with no consequences now or ever.

I fucking hate how corrupt and fundamentally dishonest the motherfuckers who were the LEAST evil choice in the election they spectacularly bungled are 🤬

For what it’s worth, I’m sorry I was a dick in calling out your credibility because of one dud link. That was petty of me.

Apology accepted, as long as you prove your sincerity by leaving me alone.

No. Fuck off.

Okay, sure, I’m not allowed to use the source you brought because it’s not credible enough.

Not what I said. Read my comment again.

It’s not even Pelosi’s “own personal stock index”

It’s named after her for a reason. Don’t be fatuous, Jeffrey.

publicly disclosed trades made by members of congress

Which is largely insider trading in the many cases where they pass or even get told in advance of legislation that affects stocks. It’s technically legal because Congress is above the law when it comes to insider trading, but it shouldn’t be.

done well for one year (yeah, that absolutely could be a coincidence

Pelosi and other congressional insiders have been “doing well” for DECADES before that index existed.

It’s not even hard to find evidence to support your position, and I’m not even particularly disagreeing with you!

So you’re just wasting both of our time to teach me a lesson about source selection?

I hadn’t had my coffee yet, ok? I promise to be more thorough next time, Mr Ombudsman.

your source. It directly refutes all the claims you’re making here.

Nope. Just because it makes invalid arguments to try and explain it away doesn’t mean that it succeeds.

That’s the subjective spin of Business Insider. That’s them trying to justify it because they’re very much in favor of it.

I don’t have to agree with the subjective parts to share it for the factual parts.

If you can’t tell spin from relevant information, why should I take your position on anything as being informed?

Speaking of your voice ACTUALLY carrying: As a kid, my voice changed to a deep bass really early, so when, attention ravaged with undiagnosed ADHD, I talked in class, the teacher would instantly know it was me 😮‍💨😄

And smash that like button!

I mean, there’s over 3,000 billionaires in the world, could be they’re busy with other targets 🤷

(Why are we whispering?)