“Falling”

Also no lawyer, but my understanding is that it doesn’t. The appeals court hasn’t ruled that presidential immunity wouldn’t be a valid defence, but rather that Trump should have brought it up earlier if he wanted to use it.

Leeds Leeds Leeds!

Not enough people apparently.

Fair analysis. Feel like it needed to lean more into the horror side of things, although I can see that that might alienate some of the audience. Instead of all the camera angles and Poirot occasionally seeming doddery I’d have preferred if the audience experienced more of what he was seeing and hearing, make it feel more like there could be something supernatural going on.

It’s been a while since I watched it, but doesn’t the baby come early, and their original plan was to deliver near the waterfall? I may well be wrong, mind.

Baboon+buffoon?

I can see the argument. He’s a terrible person for the things he’s done, not for the way he looks, let’s focus on his actions instead of vilifying anyone who might look similar but not have done those things.

I think people are more defending others who may look like him, but haven’t committed heinous crimes.

You could always use the sub-company owned by the monopoly in your city.

Was the 45 written in sharpie?