Stable bindings doesn’t mean open source, so I don’t see how that tells you it’s still on the table
Stable bindings doesn’t mean open source, so I don’t see how that tells you it’s still on the table
It doesn’t make sense for an internal library for an open source application, it that case it’s not open source.
To be fair? Nowhere are they even suggesting they would release the SDK as FOSS, but they do say their password manager is open source. It seems like they just want a FOSS shell so they can claim it’s open source for but keep their business logic closed source.
It says the build error is a bug, not the inclusion of proprietary code.
I think that can be explained, but tell me how someone can be in favor of the death penalty but be against assisted suicide.
We have this: and this:
LFP is actually a relatively old battery technology, it’s only now that the patent is expired that it’s starting to breakthrough (outside of China, they somehow got a license if I understand it correctly).
How would it be displaced by SARS-CoV2? Wouldn’t that require cross immunity?
They might realize that increasing wealth inequality might not be good for them either on the long term. They are so rich that losing 99% of their wealth doesn’t have any real impact on their day to day life anyway.
Trade with the EU hasn’t completely halted, we still buy gas from Russia.
If you can’t see pedestrians on the road (on time) you’re either driving too fast, or you’re not paying enough attention, or you’re driving a car that is not suited for roads with pedestrians. That’s totally on the driver.
Leaving that aside, what do you think causes the increase? Dark clothes getting more popular…? I believe it’s the rising popularity of bigger cars with bad visibility (and maybe also the increase of phone usage while driving).
No, reunification isn’t the status quo, that’s ending the status quo.
Xijinping saying mainland China and Taiwan will reunite basically means he wants to invade Taiwan. That is newsworthy.
At this time is history reunification means joining the PRC, there’s no question about that. And support for that is very low in Taiwan.
The reason they don’t say that in official statements and prefer the status quo is because they are afraid of war.
I don’t know anything about a “constitutional vow”.
They are named the Republic of China and claim all (or most?) of mainland China in the claimed territories, (but where those are defined I can’t find):, I suppose it’s not really wrong to call that wanting to be a part of China.
Also in the amendments they talk about the free area and the mainland area https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0000002
Of course it’s a very misleading claim because if they would claim anything else they risk war with the PRC.
All the discussion I’ve seen is also about independence vs the status quo, not independence vs joining the PRC. That’s not really on the table.
Only a very small minority did protest, that’s why it didn’t work.
No, it’s a law criminalizing the act of insulting “heroes and martyrs”
Divide by 10, minus 10%
Why go through all the hoops if they are instead just could refuse patches? Open source doesn’t mean open to contributions, look at SQLite for example.
If they had the idea to release this open source they would have said so in clear words by now. They didn’t so I don’t have much hope, unless maybe if they get enough negative publicity to change their mind.
Why does VC need to ruin everything…