I’d study it in humans first - the advantage is they can talk. I’d study the way brain works in nostalgia feeling humans. Then I’d try to find the same or similar functionality in dog brains (which are fortunately similar enough, because dogs are evolutionarily relatively close to humans).

Let me again state that feelings are subjective even in humans and you could argue that what others really experience can be different even though it manifests the same externally. I’m knowingly ignoring this phylosofical side of the problem and I’m proposing a practical scientific way to approach it.

Other human beings are the same problem, no one can tell how others really feel. Let’s get solipsism out of the way, so that we can talk practically.

Human beings share a lot of genetics and brain functions - we can study that. And they share a lot of genetics and brain functions with dogs too! I don’t think nostalgia in dogs has been studied yet, but I do think we can get an answer one day.

Exactly, that was my point.

I’m flattered, but I’m not in the mood right now. I’ll be in my corner worrying about constitution redoings…

Are you ready for some tearing up and redoing of constitution now?

Why the downvotes when OP asks in this particular sub?

Why do you think so? It is possible, but there are other possibilities as well. Many healthy parents find out they’re expecting a disabled child during an early screening. Or they could be asking just theoretically.

Did I miss OP saying they have a disability in family?

Do you think happy Down’s syndrome people are an exception? I have a different experience.

Family history of disability is not a necessary prerequisite of having a disabled child, though.

This is great, thanks!

Creative is great, industry not so much.

If I’m not wrong, he extracted the beans from the cherries, dried them and started to roast them immediately afterwards without stripping the inner hull. I suppose the inner hull could be rather prone to getting burned.

You can roast in the oven as well and smaller doses in a frying pan - works well.

Well, from what she says I understand she’s doing it for women, who have families and feel kind of sexually discarded.

You said you know that old people fuck, so I suppose you’re not shocked by the information. You don’t have to watch the movie. And perhaps later in your life you’ll be grateful you know it’s ok to still feel sexual needs.

Who’s we? Maybe older sexually active people do want to think about it. Why shouldn’t their life experiences be represented in the media? Maybe you’re just not the target group?

They were making fun of the people saying that in the sketch. The guy saying “no pooftahs” there was Graham Chapman himself :)

Well, Graham Chapman was quite openly gay, it’s not surprizing they didn’t mock gays.

I don’t know what gender you are, but you’ve just triggered my spidey-gut.

Wow, haven’t heard that one yet, yeah, that’s pretty weird. What would even angels be male for? Oh, I’m thinking too much, this is not meant to be logical, right? Thanks for showing me another bizzare corner of religious thoughts.