Ah, but you see, JavaScript is not so straightforward. It tries to help you by automatically inserting missing semicolons, but the approach that it uses is that it will insert them in the first place where doing so would make the code parse. This, unfortunately, means that semicolons are often inserted in places where you were not expecting them, so the advice is to always include them manually yourself so that you are never unpleasantly surprised.

Nice try, but this post is actually now talking about JavaScript, which means that the close parentheses areautomatically inserted.

Fixed that for you!

Yeah, I had been willing to give the author the benefit of the doubt that this was all part of a big joke, until I saw that the rest of their blog postings are also just like this one.

My humanity.

More like a scratch you just can’t itch.

My services are so small that it is impossible to know just how fast they are running!

Poe’s law strikes again!

That is what makes it Enterprise-grade!

I agree completely that, when done well, smaller functions can make code easier to work with for all of the reasons that you have mentioned. When not done well, however, I still have to read through all of the same code to figure out which part has the implementation detail that I need to care about, but now it has been scattered about instead of collected into one convenience place.

On the other hand, I often have wished that the author of the code I am reading had just kept their original 20 line function around instead of splitting it up into a zillion little functions that force me to constantly jump around to figure out what is actually going on.

Also, as I understand it, the Book of Revelation essentially only barely squeaked its way into the Bible anyway under the belief that its author was the same John as the John that wrote the Gospel of John; if it had been believed to have been authored by anyone else then it would have been left out because it was hardly a unique representative of its genre.

I wouldn’t worry about it given that Rust has issues binding to C++.

You should seriously consider using Odin if you happen to be writing code on a Wednesday and you want additional divine blessing.

…for they shall be forced to use Visual Basic.

Linux user has been here.

How can you tell?

*sniff* Still smells like smug.

Thus demonstrating that when you combine XML and C++, you truly get the best of both worlds!

I don’t know; their comment seemed pretty much the same throughout…

So… all that is NOT False either, I presume?

which is NOT False…

You really didn’t need this; I would have just assumed that you were speaking the truth.