What a coincidence. A couple of days ago in the UK, there was a tribunal court judgement on the use of the word fuck, that’s favourable to the claimant being dismissed by his company.

go on…

The Python steering committee bans Tim Peters, a Python core developer, for 3 months. In an unrelated discussion, someone proposed a new election system for the steering committee. Then the creator of Python insinuated through a comment in the post suggesting why not we ask for an opinion from an expert that he knows, but we need to wait a bit as he’s been banned. OP claims this comment has been removed, but may be it’s been reinstated as it’s still there last time I check.

edited: some grammar typos, and edit some words for clearer context.

The post is still there.

I guess they’re trying to erase Palestinian culture

and why Hungary?

Yeah, at least give you argument so I can also laugh at myself too.

Anyway, take a look at this article that just came out just earlier, which means that by no chance it’s been referenced when I wtote my earlier comment. And do take note of the BOLD words.

The Core unit is responsible for building the technical foundation behind the company’s flagship products and for protecting users’ online safety, according to Google’s website. Core teams include key technical units from information technology, its Python developer team, technical infrastructure, security foundation, app platforms, core developers, and various engineering roles.

It’s going to be more expensive to hire and train new people when the dumdums in upper management finally figure out the mistakes

Unfortunately that’s not the case. Those who have been laid off are those paid high salaries to build up the foundation. Now that the foundation is already there, they future work won’t be as complex as before and need less training. So why would they still pay the very high salaries? They’ll just get rid of the used-to-be-important programmers and hire the can-be-hired-for-a-lot-less programmers from India. It’s sad, but that’s the reality.

Removed by mod

Why? It’s would be helpful if you can provide context.

EDIT: ok thx, got it. Anyway, for some reasons not known to me, I’ve either never watch or finish watching the film.

I have all except one: Decentraleyes instead of Privacy Badger, for no specific reasons.

I learn this new term today but I don’t think it fits. May be we can look at the Korean War as a case study when China intervened (around 1950) - how China changed the course of war just like that, when they were not that well equipped as compared to now.

probably as a future deterrent, to avoid major conflict - that they are booming becoming more and more formidable opponent and should not be taken lightly.

It needs a ‘base’, at every part of the world, which would become a hub for any kind of future deployment. Anyway, it’s not just the US, it can be any powerful countries. It just matter of how they do it, nice or not so nice way, direct or indirectly. China does it through business, e.g. silk road.

I thought ‘victorinox rescue tool’ works for laminated glass. It even has glass cutter.

vixtorinox (swiss army) rescue tool. It’s a locked knife - most probably illegal in many places.

deleted by creator

the correct term you need is ‘unachievable’, not ‘false’. […] anyway, it depends on the field and type of study.

How is this incorrect? In which field? And how do you confirm you the validity of your methodology?

strength is it’s replicable. Not just somebody claiming something without justifying it can happen.