This. There is no practical reason to separate privacy and security in this way.
If bad actors can access your data without your consent, it doesn’t matter if you call it a breach of privacy or security. It’s still a breach. At best, playing semantics like this allows a corp to claim a system filled with backdoors is “secure”. Utter marketing nonsense.
Whew, good thing I heard there will be no new wars with Trump as US president
Tax dollars are definitely being stolen… by this unelected buffoon
Maybe it has to be vim in emacs on an emac
I suspect the world would collapse into some kind of singularity if someone ever ran vim on an emac.
It’s a bad movie.
It would be a bad movie even if it weren’t Star Trek.
As Star Trek, it seems like an even worse movie.
Stop making slop. If you don’t want to put the time in to give established IP the attention it deserves, get new IP.
You highly doubt my personal experience?
Proprietary by Sony, but they did open source it
The bitrate is manually enforceable on Linux, too
*specifically using PipeWire
As unfortunate as the naming misdirection is, I have to say: LDAC sounds significantly better (to me) than other Bluetooth codecs I have tried. It also works on Linux and android with no issues whatsoever. Open source is good.
I use it with a pair of Sony XM5’s, which can also be used in wired mode, so you kind of get the best of both worlds.
Nazi salutes can be anything, apparently, but pronouns were too far. Got it.
There are vim keybindings for Code. Discovered that yesterday.
Though, if you want vim bindings for Code, probably should just use vim…
I’ll tell you what though: one you get used to it, you really get used to it.
I typed :q to try and close a tab the other day.
Edit: a tab not in vim, of course
This is a good, nutshell explanation of late-stage capitalism.
As far as the answer to “what’s the endgame”, I do not know. I suspect that many or most of these rich folks are so moneyblind that they don’t know either. Or, they simply don’t believe that their collective actions will eventually cause the system to fail.
But most likely, I think, is that they believe someone else will bear the majority of any negative impact. Of course this makes less sense in the face of a systematic collapse, but again: it’s probably very difficult to see when you have dollar signs in your eyes.
This is really sad, tbh.
I personally would be freaking stoked. Would love to be a stay at home hubs, too.
But that level of stability would mean no one could make themselves richer!
The thing is: nature will bring the stability anyway. It just won’t include us. Sucks that we all have to die because the greediest among us cannot pull head from ass.
I enjoyed it, but it certainly isn’t too good for anything.
It’s a fun romp, albeit somewhat typical. Screenplay is decent, but filled with a bit too much forced fan service. The world building is fantastic, though, and pretty much worth the price of admission itself.
The deepfake version of Ian Holm is pretty egregious. Given that they developed a puppet, and that the character was meant to be a broken android anyway (not a spoiler), I do wonder why they didn’t just lean in to the weird face of a puppet. Why are his movements weird and mechanistic? Because it’s a broken android. That may have aged better than the deepfake.
But overall, worth a watch, which is at least more than can be said for other series outings.
Corpos always use socialism to their full advantage, and then they privatize their resulting profits. This is Business 101 now, in the US at least.
The shocking part is that the rich have been able to convince so many that they take no corporate handouts, or at least that they don’t rely on them, so that some people genuinely believe you can get that rich by hard work alone.
The reality is, the only way to get that rich (aside from starting as a nepo-baby, which so often is the case) is by stealing from others. Whether that theft is wage theft or taking corporate handouts (=taxpayer dollars) without paying equally or more back into the system – it’s all still theft.