dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️

Progenitor of the Weird Knife Wednesday feature column. Is “column” the right word? Anyway, apparently I also coined the Very Specific Object nomenclature now sporadically used in the 3D printing community. Yeah, that was me. This must be how Cory Doctorow feels all the time these days.

  • 7 Posts
  • 251 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • Artwork

    Yes they can, via images embedded in their ID3 tags. This is supported by a huge array of players in terms of both physical hardware and software.

    Keep your place

    Yes they can, via many players (including both VLC which is what I use, and also my car stereo).

    Sync across devices

    This much is true, at least in the players I use. There’s probably a solution with some specific player somewhere.

    But specifically for audiobooks, I don’t… need… to play across multiple devices. I listen via only two methods: My headphones (which are driven by my phone) and in my car (which works with my phone). I only actually use one player. It goes with me everywhere. Ours go with most of us everywhere; we’re naked without 'em.

    If your use case requires a networked solution, you do you. I’m just saying, don’t automatically get blinded by how the Streaming Era has kind of fucked up everyone’s brains.


  • Yes, I am aware of where this is posted and am prepared for my inevitable crucifixion as a result. But, like, is this really a problem that requires a self hosting solution? That seems like quite the overcomplication to me unless you absolutely require access to your entire selection on multiple devices that will have 24/7 network connections.

    MP3’s take up negligible amounts of storage space on modern devices and can be played on anything, and can be easily taken with you anywhere including out of network range.

    I guess teaching people how to drag-and-drop audio files onto their phone and open them with VLC would be a much shorter article.









  • The other thing I’m going to add on here is that I would have opened up the lens anyway, focus permitting, to get that exposure time down.

    1/20 sec is definitely flirting with frustration if you are handholding your camera and not using a tripod, or if you don’t have some heavy duty optical image stabilization. I typically find that anything slower than 1/60 while handholding is going to induce some kind of blur from shake during the exposure.

    Given that there isn’t much evidence of this I’m going to assume OP is either the Frisco Kid or they were using a tripod.


  • Assuming you used your 18-55mm lens for this one, the closest you can focus is about 10". If your subject is any closer than that you’ll never be able to get it in focus.

    When you’re very close to the subject like this, your effective depth of field is going to be very shallow. In fact, it might not be possible to get all of your flower in sharp focus to begin with. So this is the kind of shot that would definitely benefit from focus stacking, which unfortunately is not a capability your particular camera has built in. You can do it manually, but either way you will definitely want to use a tripod to keep it still between each exposure.

    My R10 has this capability built in but it’s finicky, so I avoid it. I do use its inbuilt focus bracketing feature, however, and do the stacking myself externally. I use Helicon Focus for this but it’s not free; those who are cheap and/or averse to pirating it may want to check out Petteri Aimonen’s focus-stack utility instead.

    Or as counterintuitive as it sounds, you could back up away from your subject and use the zoom on your lens to zoom in. Being further away will also increase your effective depth of field.











  • You used the magic word, “modern.”

    Lots of houses in this world are not modern, and some of them are old enough that they were retrofitted to have electricity, as mine was, rather than even being built with it to begin with. And done so in a haphazard manner when electrical codes were either much more lax than now or didn’t exist. And further when the expected power draw for a household was considerably lower, because basically all of it in the 1920’s or whatever was only used for lighting and we didn’t have all of our current appliances, TV’s, computers, 3D printers, or even indoor space heaters.

    So moaning about what ought to be rather than what is really doesn’t accomplish anything, especially in OP’s case.

    My small house has basically the entire ground floor wired to only two 15 amp circuits.


  • I would not buy a Razer if they paid me $120. Do yourself a favor and don’t. I’ve owned a fair few Razer products in my life and they’ve all been overpriced flimsy pieces of shit, and when they break Razer will do anything and everything to weasel out of doing anything about it. As a matter of fact, the last Razer product I had break on me was a Blackwidow Chroma, and not coincidentally it was the last Razer product I will ever buy. I think it made it a whole nine months.

    Anyway, I was in this very boat not too long ago and settled on the Glorious GMMK 3 100% for my wife, which is indeed available in white. It’s $140 USD list price, so I don’t know how that fits your budget. She got some nice cat themed keycaps for it and she’s having a ball. You can get it with various keyswitch options prepopulated, or even swap the switches around as you see fit. She got the “Fox” linear keyswitches which are not short throw but are definitely quiet.

    I use a Logitech G512 Carbon at the moment, myself. It’s not white but it has otherwise been bomber for over a year.

    This is a sterling endorsement for me. I don’t know if anyone’s noticed but I type a lot. Not just bickering in the comments, but for work as well. I am not rough on keyboards and mine never moves from this spot, but I will tickle the keyswitches on any 'board a couple of million times in short order and I probably find the service limit on all the keys that are not W, A, S, or D more quickly than the average penguin.



  • For what it’s worth, the I-95 corridor from about Richmond to Boston, particularly the DC-Balitmore-Philly-NYC part, is probably one of the worst stretches of highway in the country for generalized insanity and phenomenally poor driving skills on display from everyone involved. It is easily my most hated patch of asphalt in the universe.

    A small but measurable improvement would be made to the world instantly if every person in DC and Baltimore had their licenses revoked. Although if experience is any judge, that still wouldn’t prevent any of them from still all being on 95, three inches from the car in front and raging over “only” being able to do 80 in a 55.