The protection detail would not arrest him. The agency with the warrant would coordinate with the secret service to either get access to Trump or, more likely, give Trump the opportunity to surrender.

That essay feels like it should be posted on whatever the Lemmy equivalent of r/im14andthisisdeep would be.

As you’ve already touched on, company culture is everything at small companies. If you fit in well, you’ll love it. If you don’t, you’ll hate it. I would ask to talk to other people in the company besides the CEO and talk to them about what working there is like and what kind of person would fit in well. If the CEO (I’m assuming that is who you are interviewing with) balks at the Idea, that right there tells you something.

Sentencing is a whole process in and of itself. Often consisting its own investigation and witnesses that is intended to help the judge determine what the appropriate sentence will be.

I hear ya. There are at least some other recent examples. The settlement between Fox News and Dominion. Giuliani is being held to account for libeling the Georgia poll workers. And of course all the Trump cases. But yeah, feels like a drop in the ocean.

It’s also somewhat ironic that the plaintiffs are women. It should be obvious that after they’ve finished dismantling the systems that help minorities, the systems that help women will be the next target.

Personally, I think what they are saying is reasonable. If I start an instance with a particular goal in mind, whatever that goal may be, then I want users that will support that goal. If a user doesn’t support that goal then they should go find an instance that’s a better fit. That’s part of the beauty of the fediverse. You aren’t constrained to a single instance. Users should find instances that fit them rather than expecting instances to change to accommodate them.