could you at least say what you are quoting when using citations for your argument?

that being said: collective ownership of the means of production (what socialism means) is a direct contradiction to nation-states as long as these are unable to reflect the collective will within their structures.

what you refer to as

real life versions of communisms are in fact attempts to establish communism by communist parties within their respective nation states. communism has bever been reached - and none of these parties in power ever said that they had.

the way you use the word (associating USSR, China, Cuba, N Korea with communism) is the result of cold war propaganda. more accurate terminology for these (horrible!) dictatorships would be authoritarian regime with state-monopolized capitalist economy.

all summarized communism is an ideal economy where each gives what they can and gets what they nees, where necessity is at the core and not the accumulation of wealth.

i think you already have a bunch in the OP - just choose what fits best and add what will cancel misinterpretations of your words.

does it have to be a single word?

what is DataBackRibs? please link your community, now i’m curious

you can promote your community by responding to relevant posts or comments.

say you create a community for ducks and mallards, then you can go to the birding or wildlife communities and tell people posting there about your awesome new place

below relevant posts and comments is usually a good place for such hints

money

I’d suggest SICP, but since you said Python:

https://wizardforcel.gitbooks.io/sicp-in-python/content/

no

You mean… except Ada?

why would i need an opinion on that?

yes

chronic pain is not as much fun as they ought you to believe - turns out it’s not that easy to amputate some section of your back

https://noyaml.com/

It’s not added to an existing piece (or play) but written with the kind, length and ibtntensity of laughter. There are videos with the laugh tracks removed where you can see the small breaks of the cast waiting for the laugh track to stop. Not just is there a timing difference with and without the laugh track, no, jokes themselves work differently. Meaning: without a laugh track you might not be able to tell joke from serious because the guide is missing allowing to laugh (e.g. about the misery, clumsiness, idiocy, etc of a character). Sitcoms without laugh tracks expect compassion to do its magic and is probably much more closely tied to cultural context of the work. Nobody has to tell you what’s funny with Malcolm in the Middle or The Office, you know, because you once experienced (or observed) similar.

visually 🤭🤣

yes, this will not be used by myself directly

oooh, i almost forgot about the sacred list! thanks for the reminder, looks like there’s quite a bunch out there!

this is more a preliminary search and the result will not be used directly - but i’ll try and come back with information on choice and the reasoning behind it