But centrism isn’t about finding the geometric mean of the two sides it’s about analyzing each problem separately, making compromises and initiating slow change.
But centrism isn’t about finding the geometric mean of the two sides it’s about analyzing each problem separately, making compromises and initiating slow change.
Look, centrism is a real thing. There are people who really do like to analyze each and every problem from a more or less unbiased viewpoint and form strong opinions without the influence of ideology, while being ready for a compromise. Anyone who was serious about being a centrist I ever talked to defined their ideology this way.
With that being said there also are right-wingers who like to masquerade as centrist or sometimes moderate left just so they can use their supposed position to more effectively plant their ideas and try and normalize them.
But the thing I’m sick and tired of is when people try and pretend that this is true for every centrist, while ignoring the real problem that there are radical elements that try to masquerade as moderate ones and in doing so are polarizing and actively destroying our society.
Don’t get fooled, that’s called stockholm syndrome.
I think it’s a paraphrase of a culturally significant webcomic inserted into a more modern context without it’s original meaning being altered.
kurva anyád bóber
I’m from Hungary, can comfirm, it’s shit here it could be better.
“Couldn’t count all the stuff”
This is the beuty of FOSS. I can add them myself, whenever I want to.
Name a linux distro after her and yourself. Always works.
Jesus Christ the point you have to look someone up to decide whether he was joking or not is the point where you should just let it go, in my opinion.
But he is basically right about the numbers, so with this much effort put into his message I hardly think he wasn’t being cynical.
Darwin used to call it “Natural selection”, now we call it “Being confidently incorrect”
Well not completly, but yes most of the servers run linux
They are part right, if we really want to give them the benefit of the doubt. For the south it was absolutely about preserving slavery, but for the north abolishing it was still kind of a controversial topic.
The decision to make it about ending slavery from Lincoln’s part was part tactical, even though he personally always wanted to do so anyway. It made a lot of former slaves and other black people available for enlistment and also secured the support of people opposing slavery.
But initially it was more about the southern paranoia of the north forcing them to abolish slavery and since the north could not provide any security about this, they decided to quit, which lead the north to try and preserve the union.
At least as far as I know.
Until the moment someone finds a privilage escalation bug.
He is so confident that he might just be a troll. If he isn’t he is probably the greatest example of being confidently incorrect who I’ve seen posted here in a while.
Workarounds are generally bad in most software situations. Yes we could tile the windows instead of the tabs, but
Chicken?