This is exactly why usage analytics are important metrics…
This is exactly why usage analytics are important metrics…
You’ll take my kotlin from my cold dead hands
Note that a TikTok link is un-cleanable. It will always trace back to you. Do not ever share TikTok links unless you’re willing to expose your identity to the person you’re sharing with.
I got an Acebeam EC35 Gen II a couple years back and while there are many settings you can use there’s a big button onto he back that turns it on full blast and you click it again to turn it off. Done.
Oh yeah it’s not like it stopped him in reality but it burned his most popular acct
ensure you don’t
What’s crazy is the original poster was something of a superuser on reddit. First to 1 million karma iirc
And he lost basically all popularity after that comment.
In retrospect: it was pedantic but so mundane. He was just being a prototypical redditor
This is a good thing why you trying to spin it as bad?
Arbitration has always favored companies.
Here’s the thing. You said a “jackdaw is a crow.”
Is it in the same family? Yes. No one’s arguing that.
As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.
If you’re saying “crow family” you’re referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens.
So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people “call the black ones crows?” Let’s get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too.
Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that’s not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you’d call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don’t.
It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?
…
…
… It’s been a decade since Unidan made that comment
I am not! I hadn’t heard of it until just now. Very neat project.
No I’m just someone with a particular interest in corvids who feels represented by a god of Thought that is a bird
What a mediocre story
I think I remember this one. The knife was made of ice so it melted away right? It’s summer in NYC and an ice knife is the weapon of choice for all turnstile jumpers.
They never found a knife on him or at the scene
Oh hey it’s the guy who’s definitely not an egg. Definitely not. He just finds excuses to dress up like a woman all the time to make fun of trans people.
He definitely hates doing it. Ew. Yuck. Haha so funny look at men wearing women’s clothes. Haha let’s film another. Ooh let my try on this cute sports bra…
Date of occurrence: November 2023
You missed the point:
The original creator of a thing does not control the current usage.
It’s analogous.
Theory is fine but in the real world I’ve never used a REST API that adhered to the stateless standard, but everyone will still call it REST. Regardless of if you want it or not REST is no longer the same as it’s original definition, the same way nobody pronounces gif as “jif” unless they’re being deliberately transgressive.
403 can be thrown for all of those reasons - I just grabbed that from Wikipedia because I was too lazy to dig into our prod code to actually map out specifics.
Looking at production code I see 13 different variations on 422, 2 different variations of 429…
403 is a category, not a code. Yes I know they’re called http codes but REST calls are more complex than they were in 2001. There are hundreds of reasons you might not be authorized.
Is it insufficient permissions? Authentication required? Blocked by security? Too many users concurrently active?
I’d argue the minimum for modern services is:
403 category
Code for front end error displays
Message as default front end code interpretation
As json usually but if you’re all using protobuf, go off King.
Excellent modernization and the best adaptation we’ll likely ever see. Similar in terms of faithfulness as Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings original trilogy adaptations: artistic license taken and content cut out changed but the core is masterfully done.
I pay $100 for my eye exam and $150 for my glasses every couple years.
It would take 30+ years for that cost to reach the Lasik levels you paid, and that’s assuming I’m not doing anything with the $3750 remaining after the first appointment.