that will make some people immensely rich

Not sure what this means. Most satelites make everyone a little bit richer (weather, GPS, communication satelites).

it’s up to the cooperation of countries to research, mitigate, and control it

I would argue that companies SpaceX have a lot to lose from space debris. If space becomes inaccessible, they can’t do any business. They do a lot to mitigate space debris (especially with Starlink), and this is rational because too much space debris threatens their mission.

If the live version is already broken, there isn’t much to lose deploying the fix as soon as possible. Not sure what else they could have done here.

Of course, but I still find it remarkable that the task that was picked as an example for something extremely difficult is now trivially easy just a few years later

The example given in the comic has moved from one category to the other. Determining whether an image contains a bird is a fairly simple “two hour” task now.

Plot twist: The woman in the comic is Fei-Fei Li, she got the research team and five years and succeeded 🤯

Pretty much the hardware version of && false

it happened again with the Intuitive Machines lander that landed on the moon last week

The Github UX is amazing if you ever had to use gitlab or bitbucket

Yeah, 3D printers are everywhere. Both as a business and as a hobby, it’s bigger than it has ever been.

It’s not a different discipline, an LLM is an example of a machine learning model.

It works as long as you don’t call list() within that function.

Haha, I completely missed that it’s a game.

I wonder how often someone walks in and tells them about the mistake. Do the baristas have a standard response?

The NPR article says the opposite of the headline.

By contrast, the new study found that in a third of societies for which there is data, the women hunt large game. In other words, they do go after the kind of big mammals associated with the stereotype of male hunters.

Yes, women hunted sometimes, but in 40 of the 60 societies they looked at, women didn’t participate in big game hunting at all. In the remaining third, they did find at least one female hunter, but they don’t say what the ratio is.

no

GitKraken!

I’m not an electron hater, but a terminal in electron sounds like a parody.

Based on your post history, you probably know how to do it ;)

Just for fun, I pasted your request into ChatGPT and it did indeed produce a function that passes the tests, I’m impressed.

Admittedly, I only checked this one article. I think it’s hard to judge how evil he really was. Either way, not a hill I’m going to die on.

Yet often it was his own stubborn and uncompromising nature that defined his life – his choices paint a picture of a man who was unable to heed the words of others. This undendinly antagonistic nature cost him friends, honours and ultimately put him into the dark role of colonialist.

He was “stubborn and uncompromising”, which makes him “antagonistic”, therefore a colonialist and racist. That’s a pretty low bar. I don’t think it makes sense to define racism in a way that makes all 19th century naturalists racist.

when someone tests the causation, ie. in an intervention study