- Are you AI/bot?
- Wall of text = incomprehensible, would not read/5.
- It’s rarely about how good the devices are, but how much they cost + Apple’s two-faced moral model that makes people oppose/reject it.
There are no relevant studies concerning the topic. What might seem like a widespread trend, might as well be merely a local peculiarity.
Oh, I wouldn’t ever suggest that the method does everything its author says it does - the claims of helping in cancer cases and such are wee bit too “optimistic”.
But the question was concerning the possibility to build up cold immunity. And the answer is “yes”. The method I mentioned absolutely will build up cold’s immunity (or resistance, or tolerance if language purism is a factor) in everyone who will attempt it.
There’s no magic hocus-pocus in it. It’s very simple concept used in many “methods” - Buteyko comes to mind, so does Russian Siberia.
I have no idea whom I’m talking to in the 'Net.
Neither have you. Nor anybody else…
Can you give me an example?
Of course, but bear in mind it’s going to be a crude, primitive example.
Imagine me talking to - unknown fact to me - a pedophile over the Internet. For reasons unknown I made him angry. Angry enough to stalk me, invade the privacy of my home and steal my child, just to make me suffer because he felt I did him wrong.
My anonymity protects me against such an occurrence.
Advertisement. Malware. Scams. Abuse of trust. Current and future exploits that I have no knowledge, or understanding of.
No. I don’t enjoy being anonymous, but the problem lies in bodies, organizations, and people abusing the non-anonymity.
It’s like
Do you understand the difference?
Because we do not enjoy the invasion on our privacy.
No, we aren’t.
Many things share some traits of characteristics and, given langage limitations may be compared to one another, especially from poetical perspective, but it doesn’t make them one and the same.
That’s classic case of “apples & oranges”.
Can’t tell precisely since there are conditions, that might conserve a piece of technology to the point that it’s still going to be recovered and recognized as OOPART.
I guess that a million years or further is relatively safe bet, but even that isn’t granted.
It’s one of those occurrences, where merging two pleasant things does not result in a synergy but in antagonism.
You neither can totally relax and empty your bowels like the Lord ordered, nor enjoy a cup of coffee like a civilized human.
The question wasn’t about toxins, but about absorbing spiders via skin, which is funny, but imprecise idea. And the answer to it, is indeed uricating hair. You also completely and conveniently skipped the “natural toxins” as used by wild tribes.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6832493/
Now… You made the claim that eating a bowl of spiders is harmless.
Photo, recording of you doing so, please.
And please, stop trolling, because that’s what you’re doing.
Water isn’t poisonous. It’s a colloquialism. Drinking large quantities of water WILL kill you, because it will (again, a colloquialism) “wash out your electrolytes, thus introducing electrolytic imbalance to the organism”.
Also, please stop making idiotic and potentially harmful claims that you can eat a bowl of spiders. Or, if you’re absolutely adamant that it’s true, please provide photos of you doing so.
Until I see a photo, or a recording of you eating a bowl of spiders, you’ll get no response of me. No distractions, no avoidance, no cheap dirty tricks. Put your money where your mouth is.
I ate spiders where they are served as a meal. And I still enjoy their companionship. This does not and won’t prevent me from pointing out that they are indeed poisonous - plenty of them in fact.
It’s the same thing as with certain mushrooms. The dose makes a poison. In case of spiders, eating one or two won’t do you much harm.
My good dude, what I said is correct and you’re going to hear it from me every time the topic of eating spiders is going to be brought up. I simply can’t find it in myself to waste the rest of this evening trying to convince a guy who expects argument, not a discussion.
Feel free to treat it as “a win” or whatever suits you.
I can’t help you, sorry.