Ah at least couldn’t provides the relief of certainty. I won’t ask you then

Reading this I just realised I can no longer tell if Americans mean could or couldn’t when they type could.

Lol was pretty much my first thought.

Disappointing language… Describing one as heinous, then following with decry makes the far larger scale atrocities in that conflict come across as a tacked on footnote in his speech. While its essentially a genocide happening as we speak, by the people who claim to lead the people he was speaking about.

Felt like it was going somewhere only to end with weakness.

The most obvious explanation to me is that following so much success running pump and dump scams on his followers in some stocks but mostly unregulated crypto, he decided he was untouchable. Then tried to run another such scheme on twitter stock, but this time threw in a legally binding contract into the manipulation because he’s too dumb to realise how dumb he is.

He got so used to fucking around, he thought he’d never have to find out…