Believe it or not someone can fully understand the plot of a movie and find it to not be worth watching. Especially when that movie is rocking an 18% on rotten tomatoes.
It sounds like you just didn’t understand the film.
Don’t act that way.
Specialized tools oversells it. A chipped sparkplug will work.
Why would we give that dumbass views?
It would suck if the reasons congress had rejected it were remotely honest or moral.
Yeah that’s an issue that I would anticipate as well but at least now we are exploring options and identifying what may or may not work and what the trade offs are rather than pretending that it’s an impossibility like Mario was doing.
If an AR style didn’t provide an advantage then the military wouldn’t select designs like it.
A pretty simple how for that case would be to have a protected database where mental health professionals and institutions would report individuals with issues deemed worryng enough to bar from purchasing a gun. Then during the background check they would reference that db. If the person being checked is verified to be in that db fail the check. Maybe have some revaluation options or whatever but it’s not hard to imagine how reasonable laws that are actually enforced could actually help. The half baked laws that are half assed enforced and then held up as an example of any laws at all being fundamentally impossible just isn’t convincing.
Of all the options available to post covering this story why would you choose to direct traffic to fox news?
What is the rainbow press?
Nah you were genuinely wounded that I didn’t revere the yuuzhan vong.
Nah the mini rant tips your hand. You were not being tongue in cheek, you were being sincere.
Kind of a shitty tone to take over a crappy plot line.
The yuuzhan vong will never be canon for me.
So is the lethal limit you are referencing the LD50? If you link the studies I can look into it a bit. If you are making the case that this is all safe and normal then why was the kid going to die from drinking bleach otherwise?
Is the lethal limit the LD50? 1 in a billion is a very favorable statistic to choose.
I think you are missing a few common sense points here. When since the inception of the country did manufacturers start using chemical processes to artificially spice foods to orders of magnitude higher than what naturally occurs? This is a new process and a new problem. If the FDA made limits to access of spicy food it wouldn’t be all spicy foods and it wouldn’t be all levels of spice. There would be no large protests because the actual amount of foods impacted would be miniscule. I respect that spice is an important part of culture and identify but I think that because it is a part of your identity you are not taking a clear objective look at it. Addressing this problem isn’t an all or nothing situation, it’s just the unnatural new extreme products that are the issue.
The verbage of those warnings is on par with “this is unhealthy if you do this” not “this is potentially lethal if you do this”. So again, honestly, how is it as stupid as drinking bleach?
Listing the reason why they have those warnings seems pretty reasonable. That way kids could know that it’s not “some nanny state bs”. The verbage of those warnings is on par with “this is unhealthy if you do this” not “this is potentially lethal if you do this”. So again, honestly, how is it as stupid as drinking bleach?
Honestly you think keep out of reach of children on a food item is the same level of warning as not drinking bleach?
I think you meant lop, not lob. At least I hope vets aren’t yeeting pet testicles.