At this point, it would be more productive to list companies NOT involved in pro-israel agendas, so we can migrate to them

Here in Brazil, there are still a lot of laptops, monitors and tvs being sold with that resolution.

If true, that’s very interesting. A very practical result

Out of curiosity, is that true, or just your speculation? Are there public data of number of denials per day?

You’re right, and if we think about it, companies are well aware of that, and that’s why they don’t care for offering anything beyond the basic and walled experience, because we will buy anyway.

You will lose interest in the market, but will keep buying? Did I misunderstand something?

Have you seen the process used in plastic recycling? The plastic is literally triturated into tiny bits before being heated up for the next stages.

Edit: why the downvotes? I’m just trying to give some context on why plastic recycling is a great source of microplastics

I didn’t mean the choice of image format is a monopolistic behavior, but that the monopoly puts google in a position that any choice they make, be it a good or bad one, becomes an industry standard, without others having any choice in it.

And here we have a clear example of how Chrome’s almost monopoly is a bad thing for us.

I find the screen technology itself to be interesting, but it’s more a competition to e-ink devices than to common tablets. However, the price is too high to be well received, unfortunately. I love reading devices, but the best I could do is a 10yo refurbished one. I wonder why they’re always so expensive…

So true. I’d complement the first point to include a general lack of documentation. Sometimes, we can’t even know some pinout schema without trial and error.

Can computers be properly recycled? I ask this as someone living in a place where everything ends up in a landfill

39. Started working in my mom’s womb, before they were counting my age.

My guess is that google has been losing the public perception of an innovative company, and started to be felt as a big stable and slow moving one instead, and they’re trying so desperately to take back the previous public perception. They’re seeing the ai hype and the investment microsoft is doing on it. They probably also fear that bing might break their monopoly, and want to fully integrate some ai in their product, to prevent the competition from arising and passing the image of an innovative company.

But how do you know if it’s the clutter that is being removed? One of the indicator listed in the article is broken links from wikipedia. These links are very likely to point to informational resources or news articles, but are also being lost at a high rate.

Which implies that the brain-computer interface will never be viable as a product

Thank you! I will try it.

Those are probably the same people running my ISP, because there are no expectations of them ever implementing ipv6…

Really? I remember reading that is stored a local database… damn, I will check it again, thanks.

I use flagfox. It shows a small flag at the navigation bar indicating where in the world the site is hosted. Adds nothing to my life, but it’s cool to see it.