In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average woman’s annual salary is 79–83% of the average man’s salary, compared to 95–99% for the adjusted average salary
In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average woman’s annual salary is 79–83% of the average man’s salary, compared to 95–99% for the adjusted average salary
Uh… what am I looking at?
Freetube and mpv
(uses yt-dlp
in the background) work well for me 🤷
Lemmy drama? Why post it in this community?
Oh boy… windows. I can’t help you there, but hopefully somebody else can.
No matching distribution found for libtorrent
This tells me that windows is not supported (or distributed by that python package).
I’m afraid you might have to follow the guide and build it yourself. Or opt to use WSL. That might get rid of your headaches, but I’m a linux user, so no experience with WSL on my side.
They both use YAML, but I find the Gitlab doc to be better. If you don’t want YAML, you can try Dagger.IO which forces you to write code and can be run in any CI. Haven’t used it yet though as it requires a change in thinking that I haven’t managed yet.
Could you provide more information? What are the commands you are entering? Which system are you on? Is there a page with instructions you followed?
Fucking… Goddammit Gitlab!
I don’t know if they need more funding or contributors or something, but that has been on the roadmap for years now. I think all they can federate now are stars.
But I do hope that it’ll arrive soon. Github needs a federated alternative and gitlab isn’t going to give it to us. Radicle already has federation, but only within its network, so not exactly optimal.
Gitlab CI is so far ahead of github actions… The only thing it doesn’t have is a marketplace, but otherwise it’s superior in nearly every aspect.
It’s not the self-hosting part that sucks about github actions 😉
I literally just need dumb search. No regex, no nothing, but just for that you now need an account. Especially on mobile, I’m not going to clone every repo I come across. It’s a hassle already.
If I really do care and dependent on the repo, I’ll clone it. Otherwise I just drop it most of the time or use a third party service. But ever since Microsoft bought github, it’s been really annoying.
Oh, that’s a pity. So there is no public instance? If not, I’ll just remove it from the list. code.onedev.io is thus a dogfooding instance?
What do you mean? Github has remotes and you can push to all of them at once. Or dk mean something else?
Yeah, nix is utterly dependent on github and there have been many discussions about it. The majority of the community is very against migrating and refuses investing in anything else.
I remember a project abused github as their CDN, and github shut that down. Can’t remember the name but it was something plant-related (the name). Pods or something. If nix ever scales up massively, github just might rate limit the repo.
nobody is really dependent on Github
If that were true, moving away from github would be ezpz.
The features like searching might not be optimal
Requiring an account to find a project = not optimal is an understatement, IMO.
I’m also just a little guy who does scripting and small CLI tools. So it does not matter at all what I do
That sounds an awful lot like a fallacy. If you wait longer, then when something does drive you to say “I should switch”, you’ll run into the sunken cost issue. If you think you’re unimportant, that’s great for github because they have thousands of people that think they are unimportant but it adds up. You could be part of the solution, no matter how small.
So it’s the implementation that has to ensure a NonEmpty
is returned, but that’s up to the developer, correct? The developer still holds the gun to shoot themselves in the foot by returning an empty list, IINM.
data NonEmpty a = a :| [a]
Note that
NonEmpty
a is really just a tuple of an a and an ordinary, possibly-empty[
. This conveniently models a non-empty list by storing the first element of the list separately from the list’s tail: even if the ][
component is ][]
, the a component must always be present.
Wat? How can I “store the first element of the list separated from the lists tail” when the list is empty? Whether a list is empty or not is a runtime possibility, not a compile-time possibility.
Someone care to explain this part? It does not compute at all for me.
I honestly don’t get why people like Go. Structural typing makes it so difficult to find classes that interpret an interface. Every dumb go project has to be opened in an IDE or something with a language server to find implementors of an interface. Also, forcing every capitalised object in a module or struct to be exported is just… wat? Returning a tuple of
whatever, err
also feels wrong. It’s like they couldn’t decide between throwing exceptions or an enum and went with something in between.I get that the inbuilt concurrency features are nice, but the rest of the language and stdlib feel very lackluster. At least that’s my impression after ~2 weeks of it. My retreat to Rust was rather quick.
Anti Commercial-AI license