SCIENCE!

So your idea is to just abandon the court system and have him be locked in Gitmo or something? And that’s not fascism?

You’re just mad because you think you could do it better, but instead you’re nothing. Run for office, or get a law degree and become AG yourself, otherwise try and trust the parts of the system that are left standing.

To be fair, that genocide has been funded by every politician before them on both sides for generations. Israel has been sacred in America, since WW2 and then AIPAC. That doesn’t make it right, but that’s why, and it’s not going to change in one election.

Also, I’m not sure that Garland doesn’t want to appear political as much as they want the process to appear fair. This isn’t a witch hunt, they need to follow the facts and have a solid case that they can win in a court system that was made highly biased by the very person they are prosecuting. They need to win.

Eventually someone is going to train an AI on Microsoft’s business practices and beat them at their own game.

His regular monetization of giving desperate people money has always rubbed me the wrong way. Of course they’re going to take it and agree to be on YouTube, they really need it

My lot? I do not have a lot, not a D, not an R, parties are for sheep. All I know is that a man with brain worms, who does not believe in vaccines, is trying to trade his family name for an office he does not deserve.

I think the worm is affecting his vision

Coming soon, everything is corrupt, I have to delete the .metadata dir regularly, but it’s faster.

You’re having the same conversation with me on multiple threads and it’s me who is thick? It seems like you’re personally insulted when someone does not choose the tech stack that you identify with. It’s a language, not a religion, you’re going to be ok. I have my reasons not to like it and you do not have to approve. Get over yourself.

No, these are different situations. One openly sued the user’s of their language, the other did not.

Give them a few years to change the rules. If their prior love of lawsuits is any indication they will do so soon.

Not usually. Are you always this poor of a communicator?

Feel free to do you, I have told you this already. Seeing you’re unable to drop the conversation, when did Microsoft ever sue someone for using C#? I trust Microsoft far more than Oracle (reasons detailed in another comment). However, I do not run Microsoft software at my company at this time, other things work better for what I need.

Depends on how you “introduce me to reality”

Do you always make vague threats when someone disagrees with you on the internet?

Google got sued for using the language. They won, but I can’t afford that fight. They might lose but I refuse to believe that Oracle won’t change their mind in the future and decide that anyone who breathes the word Java owes them money. Oracle can’t be trusted.

I like languages that aren’t going to get my company sued later

When have they ever sued someone for using .NET?

Is that a threat?

C# is not my first choice but I did tolerate it the last time I worked a corporate job. MS seems committed to .NET core being open source and have never tried to rug pull C# or the .NET framework itself.

Also, I believe Microsoft’s incentives are different, and in a way that benefits me. For instance, they sell more Windows Server licenses because it’s easier for legacy shops to administrate (even though it can be done with nginx now). They also get more native software released for Windows, sell more Visual Studio Pro licenses and are able to steer people toward Azure DevOps and other Azure based cloud services.

Oracle has some similar products but their revenue streams are miniscule in comparison. They also have historically been a very lawsuit-based company, as an aggressor not a defendant.

What a well thought out retort /s