Judging someone by what their great grandfather did or who he supported is so reductive it makes your point worthless.

Tell me you use the same password everywhere without telling me you use the same password everywhere

You know what? I’ll think about it

Words matter. There are different ones for a reason

You’re right, it’s not ok

I’m also French and I don’t know, maybe you’re right and that’s a way to hide the real racist motives. I’m probably biased because I dislike all religions equally though

Again, this is not racism. There are white Muslims and black christians everywhere in France

You’re mistaken on the definition of racism. This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with how France deals with secularism

What kind of risk are you talking about?

The electrical network connecting all your federated renewable infrastructures is managed by one entity already, isn’t it? That’s the same kind of risk you describe.

I get why people don’t like nuclear power and there are many valid arguments against it but yours is not

Don’t know the answer to your question but wanted to support the question anyway. I don’t get why you’re being downvoted

I have never said that and you are reading what you want to read from my comment.

The FACT that the kiss was given without consent makes it a sexual assault. But still, it’s a surprise kiss and that’s a fact.

I wasn’t trying to say more than that so maybe tone it down.

I’m probably a better feminist than you are. That is not a fact, that’s a judgement

Let’s break it down

Is it a fact that it was a kiss? Yes

Is it a fact that it was a surprise (to her)? Yes

I’m not denying this is sexual assault but there is a difference between a fact and a judgment.

That’s actually the factual way to describe it

I think what is missing is control over the representatives. When you elect someone, you give them your power, you should be able to take it back when they abuse it.

In a representative democracy, transparency and control are key and when this is not enforced, people tend to think the system is broken and does not work. It would work if that is fixed

Sorry but even with all that said, you’ll never lure me to the evil side. I’m sticking with Firefox until it dies an atrocious death

The article doesn’t say if they intend to have 100% nuclear or if they dropped the target of 100% renewable to have a mix with more nuclear

Canada could have had the British refinement with American technology and French cuisine. Instead they got French technology, British cuisine and American refinement

Honest questions:

1. Are there allegations as strong against them (the white judges)?

2. Who would benefit from the hate/racial crime against the black judge? (Certainly not the rich friends who are probably white)

What strikes me is that you don’t even seem to care that there’s an ethical and moral dilemma of having a court justice being offered multi million gifts from billionaires. You only argue that people attack him based on his skin color.

So you think people (of color or not) that hold high power in the US judicial system should be able to enjoy the benefits of having rich friends and it should not be a concern to anyone? They should be held accountable for it?

The article started with “Texas”, so I did not go further. Felt like enough was said