So they’re disregarding things you explicitly stated “Because…” and inserting assumptions about your intentions that were not stated at all (that you didn’t want to work).

Neurotypicals are so irrational.

Before I even read your post I am inspired to inform you that managers only notice what they see. They won’t notice you quietly taking care of things, they WILL notice if other employees complain to them about you, regardless of the real issue. There’s a saying “make your work visible”, meaning that you should try to take credit for as much as you can. Even if you have to exaggerate a bit, aka “lie”. Once you understand that concept, the behavior of other workers can be better understood.

(Will now read the post and respond if I see need to) Edit: I think the response is already appropriate to the text of the post. You are dealing with exactly the problem I predicted from the title.

You have to work extra hard to overcome documented complaints. Make your work visible. Brag. Be a complete egomaniac. From their perspective that’s normal.

They’re apparently thinking you’re saying that you didn’t agree to work if there are too many patients. Thus the being allowed to not work that ward. They actually fear the union contract and think you’re trying to use it to get out of work.

“That’s someone’s property! You’re hurting the wrong people!”

State is not the same thing as government

And I’m over here just sending the bulletpoint unaided by AI. That must be why I can’t get a raise.

As the refrain goes: You first, Larry. Show us all of your data and then we can talk

Does framework try to use open source silicon where it can? Are schematics available for the CPU (or other chips)? Or is that not their thing?

I always thought the ratings were based on a community or a team of people deciding based on hard criteria. Shame…

Don’t need a degree to be a critical thinker and practice good journalism. However, evidence is mounting that MBFC may not actually be unbiased or fair. Shame, as I use it as a heuristic for unfamiliar sources.

Guess I’ll have to reconsider trusting mediabiasfactcheck. Going to carefully read their analysis and factcheck later on when I have time. That particular article doesn’t seem like misinfo to me. As I like to say, facts are facts, regardless of the source. If the article is citing sources and I can trace it back, then I will decide to trust the site.

Sucks that it’s so much work to get reliable info these days

This reply is not meant to be an attack on you or your article. Just additional relevant information to consider.

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/12659

At least it’s a “left-leaning” source…

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/press-tv/

Fuck that source. I’ll find the information printed somewhere else.

(This is in response to my own deleted comment)

deleted by creator

International Man of Warcrimes

Citations needed, comrade.

Lol, that’s not right.

I actually didn’t expect that! Thanks for trying that for me.

Thank you for engaging in good faith.