• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2024

help-circle

  • I think it was the votes of less than a third of eligible voters that made Trump 2.0 a reality, roughly another third just behind it, with the remainder not bothering to vote at all. I would say the often fantasized silent majority is actually not pro Trump.

    That means that a third didn’t bother, though, despite Trump very much being a known quantity. The exact reason why they didn’t vote is up to debate and it’s probably several reasons at once (these people are not a monolith), but it doesn’t say any good things about them or the political system.


  • Anti-intellectualism has a certain tradition in the USA, it’s kind of well-known.

    A German perspective: I think Germans have always been this stupid, they’re mostly just more willing to say the quiet part out loud than they were between 1970 and 2014 (rough estimate). The difference is that the far right extremists have a popular platform now, and the mainstream parties refuse to ban either the far right party or all the media (X, Facebook, local tabloid press etc.) that’s pushing them. If this party had been around in 1960, it would definitely have been banned.










  • I assume that’s supposed to be how it works, but constitutions have limited effect when we get the kinds of politicians who ignore the courts. I’d assume that direct democracies have very similar issues (see the 2024 UK race riots - those were fully illegal and yet they happened anyway).

    I think we need to change our societies on a deeper level. Changing the constitution could be a start for that, but in the current political climate it probably wouldn’t really.


  • It’s too easy to whip up hate against minorities, especially against marginalized minorities (I’m sure the rich would still find a way to profit, despite being a minority themselves). When our western political systems were still working somewhat, minority protections was one of the major arguments for them.

    e.g. Brexit was decided via direct democracy.

    Seems to work for Switzerland, though Switzerland isn’t exactly a utopia of progressive politics (could be worse, but e.g. AFAIK being poor sucks a lot in CH).






  • Did you read the article? It doesn’t really support your point. Though I agree that illnesses like fatty liver disease are probably a more pressing issue than the increased cancer risk.

    Results:
    Forty ingredients (80%) had articles reporting on their cancer risk. Of 264 single-study assessments, 191 (72%) concluded that the tested food was associated with an increased (n = 103) or a decreased (n = 88) risk; 75% of the risk estimates had weak (0.05 > P ≥ 0.001) or no statistical (P > 0.05) significance. […] Meta-analyses (n = 36) presented more conservative results; only 13 (26%) reported an increased (n = 4) or a decreased (n = 9) risk (6 had more than weak statistical support).