Trump is too moronic to be paranoid

They have no intention to change or move a little bit left. As mentioned they don’t have any sort of remorse for the pain other suffers, only that they got affected. So if they have no intention to change their ideas, what makes you think that there might be some common ground? Sometimes a bad ally is worse than an enemy

In a lot of animal species, relationships are lifelong. For most of their history, humans had life long marriages in all corners of the world. Why are you calling it "a crazy concept "?

Abortion is a product of the supreme Court being stuffed by Conservatives under Trump. So yes, a precise product of letting Conservatives win the elections in 2016. It doesn’t get more direct than this

The chances are pretty low. At that point you might not fly, walk in the street, eat raw seafood etc, because what if?

It’s bad because it forces a monopoly. Once co.petition is out of the window, they will recoup with monopoly prices

From my understanding there is no federal law, that’s why the repeal by the supreme Court was so bad

Correction: the rich want another world war and are pushing for it. The brainwashing that has been going on for years wasn’t paid by your average joe.

And as usual, it will be paid with the blood of the poor

I mean, it should get doable to get the difference between a 16 and a 32 y old person. The HR in there definitely could not give a fuck and played on plausibility

And then when they came for you… joking no one intolerant enough to come for someone else was left.

If you have a mortgage, you own what you paid (except interests).

If you bankrupt and are unsolved on a mortgage, and they take the house, the house is sold in an auction, the bank gets what’s remaining in the mortgage, but the rest is yours.

They usually omit the part where the market correct itself only after you sue the shit out of them

Its a bit like italy: you have many right and left parties, but each one has some flavors (stance in different issues), so you vote for the right/left party that is more in line with you social and economical policies (or a part leader you like for personality).

Since there are many choices, and each party tries to get a slice if the electorate, its very hard for a single party to cather to the majority if the peoples.

So they form a coalition, and each party in the coalition pass what are the common points, and depending on how well they have done) compromise within the coalition to pass some if their agendas

Thats the problem though. The Spanish constitution explicitly says that the country is indivisible. Therefore any independence referendums are against the constitution/illegal. And that’s the reason why the proponent of the referendum are persecuted.

The next step should be to amend the constitution, but I’m not sure the rest of Spain would allow it

This is the same problem with being tolerant with intolerants. While ideologically might make sense, it’s a losing battle that favors bad faith actors.

Not with Google help at least. Doing nothing though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8B0bWO9u3M&ab_channel=JohnnyHarris

On the other hand Facebook doing nothing literally spiralled Myanmar into ethnic cleansing.

So sometimes a bit of moderation is better

Islam is also Abrahamic.

Edit: the op comment is edited, so it might have used another word. Sorry if that’s the case

Current Belgian people != past Belgian people. And even then, it was mostly because of their super duper shitty asshole of a king

I would put Trump -> McConnel -> Ron -> This guy