Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.
Ewww, no. The programmer should have run their unit tests, maybe even told you about them. You should be testing for edge cases not covered by the unit tests at a minimum and replicating the unit tests if they don’t appear to be very thorough.
One major improvement for the vast, vast majority of movies would be improving the writing. So many movies would be improved simply by not using shitty vague cliched lines like “We need to end this!” because they haven’t nailed down what “this” will be.
A few creative teams can wiggle a solid movie out of a production with a lot of changes on the fly, but most cannot. If they are blowing hubdreds of millions then they really need to have a brilliant script to go along with it and not some boring rehash of prior successful movies. Making the same kind of movie doesn’t mean remaking the same movie. Origin stories tend to get old fast because they frequently follow the same story beats in the same order with the same vague writing.
There is a second part and that is editing. Bad editing that shaves out connecting scenes or dialogue to hit an arbitrary run time leads to a choppy story where it isn’t clear what is going on or why anyone is doing anything. Let the run tine fit the story dammit!
Also, no schools or utilities will be accessible from your rock. Have fun growing food on your rock.
Paying taxes is different than paying to own. It is one way that money is collected to pay for common needs like roads, parks, and schools and is more consistent than income or other taxation because we know how much land exists.
I guess a dollar amount could just be expected from every single person regardless of circumstance. Would that be better?
I’ll bet they paid for winrar too!
Needing to pay for gas doesn’t mean you don’t own your car.
The government taking things away under certain circumstances doesn’t mean you don’t own the things.
Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.
What, like some kind of design requirements?
Heresy!
Dove and Caress bars are pretty similar in shape, both are shaped like obese Pringles.
Even without copyright/trademark/branding kinds of protections a lot of companies don’t want to be confused with others and try to have their own unique style. The ones that do are likely going to be at the dollar store, and when I checked just now it looks like they sell Dove bars at the dollar stores so there doesn’t appear to be room on the shelves for a Dove knockoff even there.
Yup, now that they are so widespread and reliable putting a cheap motor and wiring it up is most likely cheaper than designing and testing a mechanical connection for specific models.
That is a significant portion of their voter base, who they are actuvely screing over.
They only care about people who can help them get more money, they aren’t giving theirs away.
The stock market traded on speculation of future value, not current value.
That’s what makes it a casino, because the future speculation isn’t based on anything tangible, just feelings that can be swayed by a single sentence and you never know what will actually happen. You can play the odds, and there are mostly consistent average changes, but individual stocks/bets are completely random and unpredictable.
My assumption of good faith for it happening once is going for as close to $15 as possible but trying to avoid $14.99 because that is too obvious and just went to the next double number down.
But repeatedly? There is zero chance that nobody has pointed it out.
The stock market casino, where the value of a company is based on someone making a comment about things unrelated to how the company operates.
Sick nazi reference in the numbers though.
I missed it at a glance., thank you for brightening my morning!
I love the first criteria for holiday decorations!
Not a great rule for winter coats though :)
And besides the thought of maybe having to move
This is actually a great mindset to have, because it is a perspective that encourages having less stuff. You can also think of stuff as requiring effort even if it is sitting somewhere untouched. You should still be dusting it, move it if it is in the way, clean behind it, and so on even if you don’t use it. Just possessing things requires effort if you want a clean living space, and anything you have means less space to move around in or to store the things you do use.
Honestly your overall method is solid. If you haven’t used something in a reasonable period of time then you aren’t likely to. Although you didn’t mention it, having it around is also a reminder that you aren’t using it which can be a mood killer for some people or lead to feeling overwhelmed.
Like money, you need enough stuff to live happily, but an excess doesn’t lead to more happiness. It also isn’t necessary to reduce stuff all at once. Evaluate what you still use regularly and a few keepsakes are perfectly fine!
A store is a business…
While I don’t doubt that there are places in the US that try to keep bus stops from being near businesses for the same reasons they have hostile architecture, it doesn’t seem universal at all. Touristy areas have bus stops near businesses that want tourists for example.
Just due to texture alone, shrimp and other crustacean shells are a hard pass for me.