Good and true point, but arguably most NASs are built to be used, not to be not-used…

To be honest, I think I prefer the Emacs one due to how absurd it is: https://youtu.be/urcL86UpqZc

But all of them are hilarious.

• Traffic

• Phone (CarPlay/Android Auto (yes I know Tesla doesn’t have them, a garbage decision you’ll have to live with if you bought one))

• Remote (app) features

• Don’t care/want/need, plus security risk. If you really can’t do without, use WiFi when at home, and no-idea-what for when on the go.

• Music

• See point 1, also “dumb” media devices via Bluetooth/USB should be possible.

protein folding

We’re at the point where, due to how b2c tech services work, I think a lot of people think AI === LLM

I’d rather take a compile step than having no type safety in JS, even as a user.

Damn. Thanks for the link!

Ooh, you’re totally right!! I forgot about that since it’s not in the older versions.

set -euo pipefail

Fun fact, if you’re forced to write against POSIX shell, you aren’t allowed to use these options, since they’re not a thing, which is (part of) the reason why for example Google doesn’t allow any shell language but bash, lol.

Then you’ll have to find the time later when this leads to bugs. If you write against bash while declaring it POSIX shell, but then a random system’s sh doesn’t implement a certain thing, you’ll be SOL. Or what exactly do you mean by “match standards”?

Well yeah, with CSS and user interaction it’s understandable… as I’ve linked above.

The question was if this is possible for purely-HTML markup descriptions without CSS nor clicks, and it was a rhetorical one.

So where in that can I encode an arbitrary program? Like one could do in JavaScript?

Who is “it” which interprets things? Is it part of HTML/CSS?

Boy have we got the API for you!

https://getfullyear.com/

se we need to c

Replace all spaces with the unicode non-breaking space that looks the same.

Although I know at least some language servers will detect this and mark it as an error, lol.

Wrong. Well, at least incomplete.

You need user interaction (e.g., clicking on a button) and HTML & CSS for Turing Completeness, apparently.

Reminder. :P

C# is basically Java and from what I can tell, this looks approximately valid.

Variables can always* be named freely to your liking.

*You used to have to stick to the Latin alphabet, but that’s increasingly not the case anymore. Emoji-named variables FTW!

Thanks! I’ve only known the on-device installable Adguard apps until now (which obviously won’t work for something like roommate’s Apple TV, for example), so this is new stuff to me. Interesting!

Does Adguard work on “smart devices” like a TV?