lad

One can be pro- or anti- any concept or thing, some options just make more sense

I don’t think this operator is a real feature, tbh 😅

because I’m not interested in arguing

This sounds more toxic to me, tbf

If you want an unsolicited advice:

I couldn’t agree more with the latter part, I know a lot of backend engineers who consider frontend simple without ever trying what it really takes. This is not a healthy way to view someone else’s work, and it usually produces friction between back and front end teams

I was toldo the other day that in ten years there will be no testers because developers will do all the testing.

I’ve seen how it works out in practice: there’s not enough time for testing and for developing, too, developers are going to burn and the product is going to be shit done and shit tested. Maybe it works if your company is willing to spend extra for less results by someone doing all the stuff less efficient than what they could, but that’s a rare occurrence.

Also, if this is only a change in managing bugs, nothing may have changed except for more bug tracking for trivial bugs, or the opposite, ignoring more severe bugs

Yeah, I wanted to reference Dune, too, but then thought that it’s not a very rare trope. On a related note, I took a look at tvtropes and it says that in the Dune the AI didn’t wage war, it was humans that didn’t like what AI does and prohibited it. I read the books too long ago to remember if this is so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah, but they literally used the term as used in Warhammer lore: A.I.

In Warhammer AI is forbidden on the grounds of past wars with humanity

Almost nowhere but America exists /s

Since age tends to not decrease, that may make sense: once you reach 18 you get a signed token you can use forever.

Your token might be used by someone else, though

Only last year? I thought it was the whole last decade

Or earlier, possibly

Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination

The screenshot seems to violate the licence it contains.

I meant ‘make sense’ to mean ‘could rewrite without garbage’. Maybe I was wrong, anyway

I’m afraid, LLMs are gone a bit further from the state when such ‘poisoning’ made sense.

I’m afraid that soon this may reach a point where it will be easier for LLM to make sense of the text, than for a human, if this idea gets further development.

but what else could be representative /s

once the tool no longer works, you

… try every trick to make it look like it works, blame everyone for not using it, blame everything for not working the way it should, break some things that are made with other tools that work for a good measure (it was their fault for being too arrogant, anyway)

Reminds me of one site that said I shouldn’t use ‘git secret’ because reasons. I’ve spent quite some time to find what do they propose to use instead (that wasn’t as straightforward as in this article), turns out they provide a ‘solution’ that includes their partners’ system to manage secrets. Another bullshit, in other words