I volunteer as tribute
I volunteer as tribute
… Like I said. There’s enough leaks
There’s enough leaks at this point, it’s pretty safe to assume Nintendo is just being Nintendo on the announcement. I swear I play leaked builds of half their games before they’re even announced these days.
Is that a magsafe ring?
And I watched every second of it
The ceiling tiles just thrown aside, dropping cables everywhere is such a vibe. They really were scrappy up starts
No. If you stop losing weight on a caloric deficit, you miscalculated the deficit. It’s a thermodynamic certainty. When people hit a long term plateau on a CICO diet, it’s because they either failed to adjust their total daily calorie expenditures for their new weight, or most likely they’re cheating on their calorie counts.
It killed the promise of affordable content we had for a decade. When Netflix was the only game in town, you paid less for it and got more.
Hell is a real place and we’re living in it
Wonder if that strictly means lessons learned in development, or if it hints at onboard processing like a Quest. I’ve been more impressed with smaller headsets like bigscreen than standalone units lately
I’d be happy if I could land a web dev role for 40k at this point
They’ll be out of states if we keep going then they’ll naturally just cease to exist. Or, more likely, adapt to actual regulations.
We can certainly argue over what they’re designed to do, and I definitely agree that’s the goal of them. The reality though is that on some level it is impossible to separate assertions from the words that describe them. Language itself is designed to communicate ideas, you can’t really create language without also communicating ideas, otherwise every sentence from an LLM would just look like
“Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like”
They will readily cite information that was fed to them. Sometimes it is on point, sometimes not. That starts to be a bit of an ethical discussion on whether it is okay for them to paraphrase information they were fed, and without citing it as a source of the info.
In a perfect world we should be able to expand a whole learning tree to trace back how the model pieced together each word and point of data it is citing, kind of like an advanced Wikipedia article. Then you could take the typical synopsis that the model provides and dig into it to judge for yourself if it’s accurate or not. From a research standpoint I view info you collect from a language model as a step down from a secondary source and we should be able to easily see how it gets to that info.
I think you’re giving him far too much credit. Hanlon’s razor and all that
Doesn’t matter which side of politics you’re on, Joe Rogan is batshit insane these days. Well maybe that is the side you’re on, in which case I retract the former statement.
Yeah I don’t remember exactly when he went completely off the rails, but early on it was just a chill podcast that talked about the kinda shit you’d bullshit with your buddies about
I don’t think we’re far off from 7 year olds being entirely unimpressed robots. They’ll just think it’s a dumb vacuum
The percentage seems to be padded out by inactive accounts or something, even the worst only fans profiles I’ve seen are showing ‘top 1%’ banners