Reading comprehension

But saying that a country can’t do anything about espionage unless they pass that law is unrealistic.

Who said that?

No I’m not conflating anything, you’re just moving the goalpost…

from

accountable for data privacy and misinformation/election interference violations.

to

ownership of media and telecommunication infrastructure

People can still do murder even though its illegal and most murderers are never caught, so we shouldn’t have laws making murder illegal because it doesn’t “solve” murder

would reduce not eliminate the problem

🙂 perfect is the enemy of good. I don’t think we’re going to “eliminate” espionage, something that has existed for all of written history…

I would expect a meaningful data privacy law would involve forcing the client software to be audited to ensure they aren’t collecting the information in the first place?

They are while doing business in the USA

They all suck, yeah. I think banning individual social media services is not the solution. The solution is to create meaningful laws that hold any company, Chinese or American, accountable for data privacy and misinformation/election interference violations.

So what is considered perfectly fine for Facebook and Twitter to do, got it

You don’t get to make requests lol

you can tell whoever wrote this has never run that command

Uh… isn’t that a good thing?

My guess is an x86 32bit machine

4690k was solid! Mine is retired, though. Now I selfhost on ARM

With minecraft, it allows you to select from different versions and modes of the game and set up your account.

Well, sometimes they create more problems than they supposedly solve.

This is really only the case if you use them incorrectly. Most people are not too bright

Lye definitely works, it’s just chemistry

They are caustic bases, like lye, and will eat through material that is causing a clog

I have a different perspective. I do think they are a force for truth, because it is a forum for openly sharing information. Not all of the information that is shared will neccesarily be truthful or correct, but as long as it remains open and collaborative, the truth will prevail.

Another point is that the sources for the information are cited (or at least requested and notated when missing), and it must always be the responsibility of the reader to check and understand the sources.

but it is definitely not something you should just immediately take everything on the site at face value.

I don’t think this should ever be the expectation for any source of information, really.

Thanks! Blocked em

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-field-of-firearms-forensics-is-flawed/

Bullet and rifling forensics is not based on science

Or the cops fabricated it to close the case because they have zero leads

Doesn’t look like him. Super convenient that the gun can’t be traced so we just have to trust the cops that it really was his, and that he was just out walking around with the gun and a manifesto, just days after, when anyone would be lying low?? Not buying it.