Right now on Linux, it’s only possible with Nvidia, right? I have an old 1060 on my server. (all-AMD on my Desktop).

Here I am again.

I’ve been fantasizing of making a simple GS GUI.

I use Ghostscript for postprocessing the PDF files. What do yo I use to add a color profile for example?

ELI5?

I haven’t tried it, but check this out:

https://github.com/elegos/Linux-Arctis-Manager/

If we all spent that money on gimp, scribus and inkscape, they would be so much better in just 2 years.

Something like this happened to me once. Now I’m on Bazzite on my desktop and Aurora on my laptop.

Pure bliss.

What I failed to convey is: that method doesn’t work with image based distros, unless you manually edit the boot partition maybe?

I daily drive Aurora (which is an image based distro) from an m2 caddy on my work laptop.

These kind of distros do not allow for manual partitioning, so they just use the whole drive.

My BIOS is set to prioritize Aurora.

My m2 caddy can be used on any other hardware and Aurora will boot just fine.

Isn’t it easier to boot using the bios ? zero maintenance. zero chance of an update fucking it up.

This would make for the perfect setup.

Welcome addition to the alternatives, however Paperless has set the bar pretty high.

In which threat models are Windows & OSX more secure than Linux?

Yeah, why help build the next “Adobe”? Use and donate to FOSS.

Is desktop linux more insecure than Windows? I know it’s less targeted, bit is it technically more insecure? Are secureblue and grapheneos more secure than a hardened OSX / Windows?

They didn’t want to close source it. Someone correct me but I think they wanted to put RHEL behind a Paywall.

From secure blue’s website:

Who is secureblue for?

secureblue is for those whose first priority is using Linux, and second priority is security. secureblue does not claim to be the most secure option available on the desktop. We are limited in that regard by the current state of desktop Linux standardization, tooling, and upstream security development. What we aim for instead is to be the most secure option for those who already intend to use Linux. As such, if security is your first priority, secureblue may not be the best option for you.

Why do they say that? What limitations does Linux have in terms of security?

Crap, yeah. It’s important to me. The only closed source software allowed in my PC is Steam and it’s games.

I use Alexandrite. It’s the closest to Sync / Thunder I’ve tried.

https://github.com/calcom/cal.com