renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 个月前AI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 个月前message-square133fedilink
minus-squareracemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·5 个月前There are people who find XML hard to read?
minus-squareactually@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 个月前Over time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
minus-squareCompostMaterial@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-25 个月前Depends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
minus-squareracemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 个月前But is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly? Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
minus-squarechunkystyles@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 个月前I see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.
There are people who find XML hard to read?
Over time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
Depends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
But is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly?
Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
I see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.