https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stall_(fluid_dynamics)

…and then it wants you to make an account, right? :)

I read someone saying the bandwidth is costly.

4G-joe

So all this time, the home shopping network (HSN) has been blatantly telegraphing hate!

Finally reading instructions for the TARDIS?

Because sometimes I would rather things be slow than blurry, and my workstation monitor is >1080p.

We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would be quite small now?

Why is the “three hours” notable, isn’t that kinda Rogan’s format?

I recall reading a white paper on how multi-processing is pretty easy to debug and get right, but that multi-threading was actually impossible due to cartesian explosion of possible states and multiple writers to the same memory space.

Sounds like you might want the “-AlwaysShared” option of Xvnc. Ref: https://tigervnc.org/doc/Xvnc.html

“Unrelatedly”… consession prices double… again…

Double-twist-back: it’s not under a special TLD, so you can transfer it to another registrar.

Both practically and theoretically, it might be impossible. It basically comes down to trusting trust. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ7lOus1FzQ

To assume that a GPT is right is to assume everything on the internet is right, as from that it arose.

I assume that is the intended purpose of the wago connector over the hot line.

I’m not talking about one-offs and the assessment noise floor, more like: “ChatGPT broke the Turing test” (as is claimed). It used to be something we tried to attain, and now we don’t even bother trying to make GPT seem human… we actually train them to say otherwise lest people forget. We figuratively pole-vaulted over the turing test and are now on the other side of it, as if it was a point on a timeline instead of an academic procedure.

The natural general hype is not new… I even see it in 1970’s scifi. It’s like once something pierced the long-thought-impossible turing test, decades of hype pressure suddenly and freely flowed.

There is also an unnatural hype (that with one breakthrough will come another) and that the next one might yield a technocratic singularity to the first-mover: money, market dominance, and control.

Which brings the tertiary effect (closer to your question)… companies are so quickly and blindly eating so many billions of dollars of first-mover costs that the corporate copium wants to believe there will be a return (or at least cost defrayal)… so you get a bunch of shitty AI products, and pressure towards them.

You forgot to wear your tinfoil hat.